User talk:Kesh/Archive-Jul2007

List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts
Please see this proposal. The way, the truth, and the light 00:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Hallpriest9 replying
What I meant by my help desk question was that a certain message keeps reappearing on my talk page. It is currently viewable in my archive. I will highlight it by means of magenta font colour. Please reply on my talk page when you have viewed the message. Hallpriest9 ( Talk |  Archive ) 00:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've looked into the archive, and the warning is showing up because you removed another user's image and replaced it with one of your own. Your own image did not have proper copyright information, while theirs did. While it may have been a bit much to accuse you of vandalism, replacing the image was not the proper thing to do. And the warning was replaced because you removed it from your Talk page, which is considered bad form on Wikipedia. There is no way to "block" it from being added to your Talk page, but if you discuss the matter with that user, you should be able to come to an agreement. -- Kesh 00:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * (Note: the above was also posted on the user's Talk page.)

Deletion review/Log/2007 June 26
You earlier weighed in on the above DRV, but made your opinion based on only the partial information availible, as you could not see the versions of the article in question. I'm involved as a deleting admin. I beleive in fully informed opinions, even if that means the opinions may go against me. So I have placed both the AFDed and G4ed versions of the article back in the creator's user space so that they can be seen, given that they are the core of the discussion. If you have time, and are willing to return to the DRV discussion, you should be able to give a much more fully imformed opinion on the issue this time. - TexasAndroid 13:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Here are the two pieces of legislation added to the userfied article. Both were entered into legislation in Texas and passed as law after the article was userfied. The first legislation requires every school district within Texas to adopt policies regarding Teen Dating Violence. The second legislation (called "Jennifer's Law") is to award posthumous diplomas. The deleted article has all relevant references and are fully cited in newspapers as well as legislative records.


 * On February 5, 2007, the Texas Legislature's State Representative Dawnna Dukes entered a bill to require school districts in Texas to create policies regarding Teen Dating Violence. This bill was created in memory of Jennifer Ann Crecente[13] and Ortralla Mosley.[14] Jennifer Ann's Group provided testimony on February 8, 2007 to the legislature in support of this bill. Governor Rick Perry signed the bill into law on May 18, 2007 and it immediately went into effect. [15]


 * On February 15, 2007, on the the one-year anniversary of Jennifer's murder, Senator Eliot Shapleigh entered a bill to grant posthumous diplomas to students that have been murdered during their Senior year of high school. The bill is named "Jennifer's Law".[16] On May 28, 2007 the bill was signed in the Senate and passed to the Governor Rick Perry for signing. It will go into effect upon being signed or September 1, 2007, whichever occurs first. [17]

Also, although it has not been added to the article, the subject of the article has been a story on the Montel Williams show.

Drew30319 14:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Message left on this profile
I noticed you left a message on this talk page, and am a little confused about the comment. The revisions done yesterday were updating the "designer" field to refer to the designers on each of the projects, and the only links added were to the wikipedia pages of these people if they already existed. Would it be possible to get these changes reverted, as the link next to this field is talking about the game designer as a role as a person, and "Harmonix" is not a person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.252.215 (talk • contribs) 15:38, June 27, 2007
 * I may have jumped the gun in leaving the template on the talk page. However, it wasn't clear to me at the time that the actual designers were being linked. The only guy who had an article on Wikipedia (Robotkid) is pretty poorly sourced, so it read like a scam to me. I'm willing to assume good faith and put it back for now, after doing some more searching. -- Kesh 16:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Gandhi Information Center / Christian Bartolf
I would like to ask (according to Seraphimblade's advise of today) if the two rewritten articles could be restored. You find them at the moment here: User:DGG/sandbox/Chrbartolf or outside Wikipedia:. Thank you for your kind attention and soon responses. Chrbartolf 30 June 2007
 * I'm not an admin, so I don't have any control over it. I'll look at the articles though and see if I can give some suggestions to improve them. -- Kesh 20:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

After reading your fine comments (DGG and LaughingVulcan) I think the best continuation is to follow your proposal, LaughingVulcan when you just wrote: "I'd rather take a day or two now to reduce the chances of it being deleted again, then take the risk and see it disintegrated instantly by a passing Admin." This is why I remain without action during this day, before you will have finished your editing of the text for which I am very grateful to you, of course. After all, I just want to express that I do not complain about other editors at all. On the contrary, I am lucky about your cooperation and willing to follow your advice. To avoid any further misunderstandings, I communicate openly on the talk pages. It would have been easier for me to observe and just resign. But I identify with Wikipedia readers - that's it. The better the article, the higher the standard of the article, the more the article fulfills the criteria, the better for all. So, please inform me about the result. If there is anything I can do for you, please inform me as well. Chrbartolf 1 July 2007

List of video game developers
You did the deletion process wrong on this article. I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Crap. Thanks. I should've known better than to try doing that while I'm so tired. :) -- Kesh 02:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey Kesh I saw on this AfD you wanted to get the new categories going. I have awb fired up and ready to go so I'm gunna make a start on this if that's cool with you. --Breno talk 07:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, go for it! I was kinda dreading tagging all those articles by hand anyway. - Kesh 17:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey no probs. Had a couple hours free today so what better way to spend it than wiki cat sorting :) --Breno talk 18:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD on Red_army_crimes_in_Lithuania
. I have stated there that I am the one who moved the threaded comment. However, User:DMacks seems to think that it should not be on the talk page. This means in fact that no one will vote there anymore, as the whole thing is an utter mess now. Thanks for your contribution there, by the way. --Pan Gerwazy 08:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I'm afraid Ttturbo really has no interest in Wikipedia rules, and is out to push his POV no matter what, so the mess started with the first article. Now I'm concerned about the new ones and the category he made, too. - Kesh 17:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that I undid the removal within minutes of my original change. DMacks 06:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Lithuanian diplomacy
Kesh, please look at one of the most recent communications from Ttturbo which appears to summarize his mindset and goals. Given its content and the nature of the back and forth communications of the past few days, I'm suggesting that the best course going forward is to not directly engage Ttturbo any more. Even the most conciliatory and rational communications with him prompt suspicions of secret police machinations and accusatory responses. There seems to be a deadline approaching over the next five days that is driving his crusade. It's possible that once this deadline passes, Ttturbo may move on to other projects. I'm thinking of placing this same message on other key players' Talk pages as well. Thoughts? Jim Dunning | talk  23:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Somehow, I doubt he'll leave that easily. I have a feeling he's going to keep pushing this crusade of his until he finally gets banned, which will only cement his belief he's being persecuted. -- Kesh 01:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Oliver Doria
Hello Kesh, thank you for your very kind help, recommendations and input. I would like to contribute to the best Encyclopedia for the future generation. My english is not very good and I am completely illiterate, I am also the LPIB (least paid Investment Banker) in the world, the worst Billiard player in the World the eldest guy on the internet. I am also completely uneducated unable, have no cv no skill, no knowledge no nothing but I am definitely kompletely illiterate and incapable of publicising any film or screen writing I have never made. What I mean was to contribute for free for ever and with absolute, integrity, honesty and honour to share with the public the thousands of mistakes, errors, bad judgements and bad choices I made in my wonderful life. I would also like to propose to create the illiterate club (following the advice of my brother Thierry) and have already a few thousand people unwilling to participate to this new peaceful, friendly unachievable project to improve this materialistic edonistic meritocratic world.

Wishing you and all the wikipedians a good week end

Olivier Doria —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olivier doria (talk • contribs) 03:10, July 7, 2007