User talk:Keshardeo

AfD nomination of Nina Roxanne
I have nominated Nina Roxanne, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Nina Roxanne. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nina Roxanne
A tag has been placed on Nina Roxanne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

How not to write Wikipedia biographies
I read the whole first section of Nina Roxanne without finding out whether she's notable for being a politician, a scientist, and artist, a journalist, a theologian, a professional athlete, a stage actor, a noted terrorist, etc.

I should be told that in the first sentence.

In the second section you suggest she's a "star". Does that mean an actor, an athlete, a pop singer, or what? At the very end it is suggested, but not stated explicitly, that she's a model.

That's no way to write such a thing. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)