User talk:KesslerRonald

If you send me your email, I can send you the Washington Post stories from Nexis documenting my contribution. Since there was a happy ending, I suggest the item is not all negative and shows the DAR gets it after all.--Ron
 * If you go to User:Crockspot, there is an "email this user" link at the left. I'm out for a few hours. Have fun. - Crockspot 21:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

DAR
Hello. I temporarily moved the contribution you made to the DAR article to the talk page, until I can verify that the source exists, and can write a proper citation for it. You might want to consider paring it down a little as well. Added to the Marian Anderson issue, the article is now overwhelmed with racial issues, which may violate the undue weight guidelines. - Crockspot 21:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, something else, I just realized who you are, and you should be aware of the conflict of interest guidelines regarding editing articles about yourself, or companies you work for. I am not one of those who believes that it is impossible for someone to objectively edit an article about themselves or their company, but there are those who do believe that, and they may make an issue of it. WP:BLP, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS are also some good guidelines to have under your belt. Happy editing. - Crockspot 21:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I found an abstract and wrote a proper cite. I also wikilinked your name to your wiki article, and removed the external link per policy. Some of the language does need to be adjusted. What works well in a newspaper article may be considered too POV for an encyclopedia, things like "ignite" and "firestorm" would be considered pov. Some people give others a hard time for even saying that there is a "controversy" about something without a secondary source documenting the "controversy" itself. - Crockspot 21:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kessler author 2005 med res.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kessler author 2005 med res.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have marked the file as GFDL. Please read up on WP:GDFL in order to make sure that this license to make sure it is sufficient according to your purposes, and that you are OK with its distribution clauses. If you disagree, please mark the file with db-author, and it will be deleted. The Evil Spartan (talk) 01:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ronald Kessler.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ronald Kessler.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

PLEASE NOTE: THe photo is a free use photo that is on my website: www.RonaldKessler.com


 * Just a note : That image will be deleted unless you certify you are the copyright holder and are willing to make it available under a free license. To achieve this, just add "I am the copyright holder, and I ..." etc plus  on the image page Image:Ronald Kessler.jpg.  If that image is Public Domain just add a direct link to the source and a  tag.
 * Thanks
 * / Mats Halldin (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * A second note: I can see that image is on that site, but I can't find any information about it being "a free use photo".
 * / Mats Halldin (talk) 14:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I have deleted Image:Ronald Kessler.jpg, because it was not being used in any articles and it was an exact duplicate of Image:Kessler author 2005 med res.jpg. Please let me know if you have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ronald Kessler Author.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ronald Kessler Author.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Ron,
 * I've included that image in the article now. Please stop uploading it under various names.
 * Thanks, and feel free to drop a question on my talk page if you need more help.
 * / Mats Halldin (talk) 19:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Ronald Kessler
Another editor has added the  template to the article Ronald Kessler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I removed it, since he is clearly notable, and COI is not a reason for deletion. However, you must add some third - party references to the Polk awards, and reviews of the books showing their best-seller status. Please read WP:BFAQ for some relevant further advice DGG (talk) 02:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't know how to list references for every award going back to 1966 except to say they are all listed in Who's Who in America. The same with listings of books that have been on the NY Times list, which are all online. The references to books being on the NY Times list have been deleted from the article in any case. Also please note that the NY Times did not run a correction after all and so I suggest that the controversies section be deleted.--Ronald Kessler

Autobiography, COI, and removing comments
Please be sure to read the entire Autobiography content guideline and Conflict of interest behavioral guideline before editing the Ronald Kessler article and any other article you may have a conflict of interest in editing (such as NewsMax Media). Also note that removing comments left on article talk pages is considered vandalism and you may be blocked from editing for doing so. TheslB (talk) 02:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Remember (talk) 18:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

FYI
Something that may interest you here. – Lionel (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=598467240 your edit] to Ronald Kessler may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * University|url=http://beta.franklinpierce.edu/about/news/Fry_Kessler.htm/|date=February 24, 2014 |accessdate=March 7, 2014}}

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=623455435 your edit] to Ronald Kessler may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * forth between Washington and Wilmington listed in Kessler’s book The First Family Detail. cite news |work=TheWeek|accessdate=August 31,  2014|url=ref  http://theweek.com/article/index/265890/the-weird-inaccuracies-in-ronald-kesslers-new-book-on-the-

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Minuetta Kessler
Hi, thanks for making those corrections on the article. I have been working on the article all last week, only to see it posted by another editor. Please look over the new version to see if everything is in order. All information must be verified by a reliable source (not a blog). Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Fantastic job! How did you become interested in my mother Minuetta Kessler? Thank you!--Ronald Kessler
 * Thanks. We have a new Wikiproject, Women in Red, which is trying to ameliorate the systemic bias against women on Wikipedia. This new project runs frequent virtual editathons; this month's is on Women in Music. I look for the Jewish names and work on those. Your mother's biography really inspired me. All the best, Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ernest Borek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Ernest Borek
Hi, I didn't realize you're editing as the same time as me. I went through the article, added links and wikified it. Could you give me a minute to finish? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Please note that a lot more sourcing is needed for verification of the facts. If "Trends in Biochemical Sciences" is a book, please provide a publisher, year, and ISBN; if it is an article, please provide the newspaper or magazine name. The New York Times article also needs an article title. Please also be aware that the article will probably be tagged for conflict of interest. Yoninah (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Minuetta Kessler
Hi, I noticed that you added some information about the Calgary cowboy hat manufacturer. Would you mind providing the name of the article and the author in the Calgary Herald? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC) The Calgary Herald article is headlined "Acclaimed Concert Pianist Left Her Heart in Calgary--Minuetta Kessler, 88, Dies in Boston" by David Bly. Please email me at KesslerRonald@gmail.com is that would be easier.--Ron KesslerRonald (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I will for the next question :) Yoninah (talk) 01:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Looking for corroboration on the story about Clinton
Today I stumbled upon the story that, I believe, first appeared in your book, The Secrets of the FBI, regarding how Hillary allegedly humiliated Vince Foster at a meeting the week prior to his suicide. I'm trying to assess the credibility of this story, and was surprised to see a lot of pages on various sites attack your credibility as an author. Is the original FBI report, that you indicate was omitted from Kenneth Starr's final report, is available publicly? If not, are there any other sources I could use to help me determine whether or not I should believe this? At the moment, I'm not planning on trying to get it into any WP articles. But, if I become convinced, and if there are reliable sources for it, then certainly it would belong, and I would try (material this contentious, though, is often the subject of edit wars.) Thanks. Klortho (talk) 20:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC) The two former FBI agents are quoted on the record in my book "The First Family Detail," but byond that, there is no further corroboration. As you say, this could become the subject of edit wars, and since it's not one of the top revelations in the book, probably best to leave it out.

File permission problem with File:Dr. Morris C. Shumiatcher.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dr. Morris C. Shumiatcher.jpg, which you've attributed to Dr. Morris C. Shumiatcher. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rosemary Kennedy into Joseph P. Kennedy Sr.. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello KesslerRonald, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to J. Edgar Hoover have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

The material I added to the J Edgar Hoover entry is from my book that is copyrighted by me and specifically from a published article that I wrote citing the book. Please reverse your removal of the addition.--Ronald Kessler (KesslerRonald@gmail.com)

Image without license
Per Wikipedia instruction, added license tag for File:Ernest Borek.jpg. I took this photo of my late father Dr. Ernest Borek. Please remove the deletion tag.KesslerRonald (talk) 02:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Ronald Kessler

File copyright problem with File:Ernest Borek.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ernest Borek.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

I took this photo of my late father Dr. Ernest Borek. I do not remember the date but it was decades ago. I do not know how to insert the correct free licensing information. Please remove the deletion instruction.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, KesslerRonald. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.  (re: this edit for example, the article is about the United States Secret Service, not you.) - wolf  23:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. - wolf  03:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your username
Hi, I know there's a lot going on here all the sudden and I'm sorry to pile one more thing on top of that, but it has been pointed out that technically your username is a potential violation of the username policy. I say "potential" because it is not permitted to use the name of a living, well-known person unless you are that person. That being said, this was not policy nearly 15 years ago when this account was first registered. Most usernames from that era are considered "grandfathered" but in this specific scenario it is arguable that the biographies of living persons policy also applies, and that is an extremely important policy. Below is the boilerplate material you would see if you had been blocked for this issue. When you have a moment, please take the time to verify the identity of this account in order to prevent blocking over this issue.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username.

If you choose to keep your current username, please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org including your real name and your Wikipedia username to receive instructions from our volunteer response team about account verification. Please do not send documentation without being requested to do so.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username.

Beeblebrox (talk) 08:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Verified. &#8209;&#8209; El Hef  ( Meep? ) 15:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

RESPONSE: Done!


 * Awesome, thanks all for your prompt attention. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI_JS_signature_icon_LTR.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. Possibly (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Now that, as agreed, I will only be submitting proposed possible additions to my Wikipedia article or other articles that cite me on the talk page, I respectfully request that you remove the tag at the top of my article citing possible issues. I now realize that the reason it appeared that I had submitted so many contributions to my own article and other articles is that, given the arcane nature of Wikipedia citations, I have, especially in the past, in some cases submitted as many as 10 or 20 submissions for one contribution until I got it right! In any case, what counts is that each submission has conformed with Wikipedia WP:SELFCITE guidelines, which require that contributions be relevant and based on a solid source. The 63 footnotes in my article all cite major media sources such as the Washington Post and New York Times and have been approved by multiple Wikipedia editors over the years. Moreover, my article now contains a lengthy criticism section. Note also that I have made only a few contributions to my mother Minuetta Kessler’s Wikipedia article, such as a link to her papers at the Boston Public Library. Ninety-nine percent of her article was written by yoninah17@gmail.com, who did prodigious research to compile it and has no connection to me. The multiple submissions from me again constitute my failed attempts to get the Wikipedia citations right. Please consider removing the tag on her article as well. As for the separate complaint that citation of material from major media sources constitutes “self-promotion,” most of Wikipedia would be wiped out if this complaint were taken to its logical conclusion. Further, I’m sure a large portion of material on Wikipedia comes from the subject of an article but was submitted by a professional or a friend or family member, so no one knows that it originated with the subject of the article. Again, as requested, in the future I will only propose additions to my article or articles that cite me on the talk page and will not make any changes to my article or other articles that cite me. I believe we have resolved the issues, so I believe the tag can be removed. I appreciate your help and understanding. Ronald Kessler[KesslerRonald]--KesslerRonald (talk) 20:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Ronald. Thanks for your note above. Posting on the article talk page is the way to go. On a general note, I see you have written for some very reputable papers. Cast your mind back to the time someone you were writing about called your editor and asked for changes to an article. I'm sure the editor would have heard them out, but kept their journalistic independence and not let the subject interfere. Wikipedia works largely the same way: we are not particularly interested in what the subject has to say about the article we are writing, but we are willing to listen through an isolated channel like the talk page. Thanks. Possibly (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Makes sense. Thank you!--Ronald Kessler--KesslerRonald (talk) 22:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not mark all your edits as minor when they do not meet the criteria
Hi KesslerRonald! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 11:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Got it, very appreciated![KesslerRonald]--KesslerRonald (talk) 12:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mass. Gov. Volpe examines Liberty Tree plaque.tif
Thanks for uploading File:Mass. Gov. Volpe examines Liberty Tree plaque.tif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

I cannot provide the requested photo permission. The photo was taken by a Boston Herald photographer and published in the Boston Herald when I was a Boston Herald reporter covering this news event in the late 1960s.KesslerRonald (talk) 12:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Ronald Kessler
 * We cannot host this photograph without verifiable evidence of permission. The photographer or newspaper almost certainly still retain the copyright. Please understand this is why I rolled back your edit and nominated the file for deletion. Jonathunder (talk) 14:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Please see emailed permission below from the Boston Herald and reverse the deletion nomination. Thank you for your help! Fwd: Copyright permission, please Marc Grasso  Attachments 9:31 AM (1 hour ago) to me Hi Ronald, Thanks for reaching out. Please credit the Boston Herald in your usage. Marc D. Grasso, DBA Controller Northeast Region Office: 617-619-6111 -- Forwarded message - From: Ronald Kessler  Date: Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 2:05 PM Subject: Copyright permission, please To:  I would like to add the attached photo which ran on page one of the Oct. 6, 1966 Boston Herald taken by Paul A. Doherty to the Wikipedia article about the Liberty Tree--see Memorials heading below. Thanks!--Ron Kessler (301 279-5818) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_TreeKesslerRonald (talk) 15:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[KesslerRonald]