User talk:Ketil

Another case like Ryzom
After seeing your posting on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability‎, I realized that the issues at Ryzom might be somehwat similar or related to issues at Battlezone II: Combat Commander. Maybe that's of interest to you and you could provide some 2nd opinion there. regards, --Kmhkmh (talk) 08:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Right, that looks similar. Let's see how things look when the dust settles in WP:V? I'm leaning in the "does not need citations" direction, but we'll see if there is some kind of consensus. Thanks for the pointer! Ketil (talk) 09:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * To me it looks like a problem of properly balancing the blocking fan cruft and overly zealous quality control. Yes we need to block fan cruft, but we don't want (quality control) editors insisting on a mindless formalistic application of rules and as a consequence hackling normal authors and essentially keeping them from writing good and informative articles.--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Links (programming language) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Links (programming language) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Links (programming language) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katyusha rocket launcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qassam ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Katyusha_rocket_launcher check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Katyusha_rocket_launcher?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message
==Krav Maga edits= I would like to request that you slow down your edits on the Krav Maga page. You have made several, extensive edits in a short time and you have, although I believe un intentionally, hijacked the page. The extensiveness of the edits you have purposed should require consensus within the talk page before the edits are applied (please refer to the rules on major editing). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bverji (talk • contribs) 21:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)