User talk:Kettering Ken

Welcome!
Hello, Kettering Ken, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Gavbadger (talk) 20:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Eyesnore. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Royal Corps of Signals— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Eye snore  21:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Royal Corps of Signals with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Eye snore  19:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Royal Corps of Signals with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mike1901 (talk) 19:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Corps of Signals. Gavbadger (talk) 20:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Royal Corps of Signals does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)