User talk:Kevco23

Nikki Benz image
Kevco23,

I'm appealing to you to please stop adding the image of Nikki Benz to her article. Images uploaded to Wikipedia have to follow some strict copyright rules. When you uploaded the image to Wikipedia Commons, you indicated that the image was free under a Creative Commons, but that seems to be untrue. The article had a free image on it before you got to it, so that one should be restored. Thanks. EricEnfermero (Talk) 18:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * And I'm appealing to you that the picture is an updated picture as opposed to this ancient one that's on her profile. With all due respect, leave my image as is and stay off my back. Thank you.Kevco23 (talk) 18:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm fine with updating the picture if we can find one that meets the copyright rules and we don't have to actually lie on the upload page like you did for the one you uploaded. No one is really trying to get on anyone else's case, as long as we follow the basic rules that will keep the encyclopedia in good standing with basic things like copyright law. EricEnfermero (Talk) 19:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Just as long as we understand each other...might just be the license I picked out for it. I apologize that I came off rude; just trying to understand the whole process! Kevco23 (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * It's not the license. It's a copyrighted image. No porn site is going to release their photos for free use by the public under any kind of a free license. They would be putting themselves out of business. EricEnfermero (Talk) 19:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I just removed the image from the Nikki Benz article because there is no evidence that it is under a free license. Please provide specific, conclusive evidence that the image is under a free license, and I'll be glad to restore it and assist with tagging it properly at Commons. (But, as Eric noted, it's highly unlikely that the image is under a free license.) —C.Fred (talk) 19:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * All due respect once more to both of you...Brazzers shows which scenes are coming out and which are already posted along with FIVE PICTURES for each scene. Not all the 1200 pics they took for the shoot are publicly posted. You can delete this one, but the other one Eric is on my case for is really idiotic; even after citing the site it's up for deletion. For real? Kevco23 (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Publicly posted is not the same thing as under a free license. And yes, for real: both Commons and the English Wikipedia have strict rules about image uploads and licensing. —C.Fred (talk) 19:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Well then I want nothing to do with you idiots. Seriously; worse than the Gestapo. Have a good evening. Kevco23 (talk) 20:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)