User talk:Kevin02478

December 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Abiogenesis, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 22:31, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vance Joseph, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Kevin02478 and welcome to Wikipedia. A lot of your edits seems to be based on reflecting negative information only regarding football personal. A lot of your content includes what we call original research. For example, before calling someone "the biggest bust" (which could violate our biography of a living personal policy) you should start a conversation on the talk page as this could be controversial. Please read over our original research and neutral point of view policy. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles and content relating to living or recently deceased people
Doug Weller talk 07:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:1092015.peyton-manning.ap -1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:1092015.peyton-manning.ap -1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Need to comply with WP:BLP
Hi Kevin02478, this edit on Sarah McBride's article was disruptive and not in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines - see WP:BLP and MOS:GENDERID. To contribute to Wikipedia, you need to use the existing policies and guidelines to guide your editing. Otherwise, you may be blocked. Dreamyshade (talk) 20:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)