User talk:KevinGrem

July 2016
Hello, I'm Feinoha. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Extreme metal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fei noh a  Talk 03:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Speed metal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 17:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Headhunter (album), you may be blocked from editing. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 17:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

An extended welcome
Hi KevinGrem. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. Since you've only made a few edits so far over the years, I thought you might find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as an editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Your recent editing history at Led Zeppelin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 19:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alerts for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and for gender related issues
Doug Weller talk 18:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jared Taylor. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Could you please stop edit-warring and respond?         --Ronz (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for responding on the article talk page with an edit request. --Ronz (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Important notice
- Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Also read wp:legal.Slatersteven (talk) 10:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 16:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Jared Taylor
You've argued for your point-of-view and edit warred repeatedly over this.

Whether you simply do not understand what Wikipedia is or not, your arguing is becoming clearly disruptive.

If you continue to make the same failed argument, you will be blocked from editing. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)