User talk:Kevinadean2002

Animal nanny
Hi Kevin, the article had already been tagged as spam before I deleted it. the article needs independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. Although it is referenced, the sources are an unverifiable email, the company website and professional associations, none of which struck me as independent or establishing notability. It's not obvious why an apparently small company in one city is of global interest.

The general tone reads like an advertisement. Headings like Services & Benefits; lists of benefits, without comment or mention of any disadvantages; insurance - why is it necessary to mention that, except in an advertisement to reassure potential customers?

I think you need to provide independent sources to show that this company is genuinely notable enough for a global encyclopaedia. The style needs adjusting to make it less obviously promotional - at present it reads as if it is the company's flyer to potential customers (dump the lists write in a neutral tone, compare with similar companies, mention criticisms etc) Hope this helps,  Jimfbleak . Talk to me. 05:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)