User talk:Kevinba99

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because to me it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks, Materialscientist (talk) 04:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Potassium sorbate
Hi, I see that you want this article inform readers that most potassium sorbate is synthetic, sounds cool to me. For the rest of the article I had improved the English, minimized the redundancy (the prep was described multiple times), corrected the process description (it is not typically made by neutralizing sorbic acid) and had added some details for how it is made. So I am hoping that you'll allow those fairly boring details to remain if we mention that most potassium sorbate is synthetic. We dont normally differentiate the synthetic vs semi-synthetic vs biological (potassium sorbate does not exist naturally to my knowledge), so we would mention the synthesis vs "au natural" theme in the production seciton, otherwise we risk WP:UNDUE.. Let me know, cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 01:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

That looks good.

Proposed deletion of Space Empire II
Hello, Kevinba99. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Space Empire II, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cnilep (talk) 04:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Space Empire II for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Space Empire II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Space Empire II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  czar  &middot;   &middot;  07:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

I originally tried to add comments about converting "Space Empire" for amiga and called it "Space Empire II", that author kept deleting it saying it should be its own page. Now you are saying it shouldn't be its own page. There are to many hands in the fire here. The left hand has no clue what the right hand it doing. You need to speak with the "Space Empire" Author because there are other conversion on that page that he leaves but when I put my 2 line sentence how I converted it to amiga he kept deleting it.

It is almost impossible to add legit stuff to wikipedia with all these authors dictating there own rules and different ones for each author.

Space Empire II listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Space Empire II. Since you had some involvement with the Space Empire II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).  czar  &middot;   &middot;  07:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Space Empire II. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  06:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)