User talk:Kevincc123

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Invincible (Eurovision song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 21:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Willys. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Willys was changed by Kevincc123 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-10T21:25:11+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Willys. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —Animum (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! ☺  21:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sack your mum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk)  21:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sack your mum
A tag has been placed on Sack your mum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  21:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)