User talk:Kevinpcarter

Welcome!

Hello, Kevinpcarter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text  to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Glacialfox (talk) 23:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Upper Holloway, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Please do not add unrelated material to articles, wroten in 1st person, also material that could be considered self promotional, thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 16:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello there, I made this edit thinking to add some video data about the area Upper Holloway would improve the page. The content is taken from a project which asks people about their area, the content is organised by postcode, seemed like a good fit ? not sure why its been removed (Kevinpcarter (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)).


 * I've understood your intent and what you mean. But an interview to an user (as I suppose, the subject in the interview is you) or anybody about what kind of people live in your neighbourhood (also unsourced) is not the kind of material for Wp purposes, per WP:POV, WP:MOS etc. If this article will be submitted I will create the related category on commons adding the commons link to the interview files you uploaded there (I've checked their categorization). Regards and good work. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Digital community art
Hello, Kevinpcarter, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Digital community art, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! andy (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Digital Public arts


The article Digital Public arts has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 15:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Digital community art for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital community art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Digital community art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 14:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Digital community art. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Landscape-Portrait, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Hallows AG (talk) 04:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Invitation to wikiFeed
Hello Kevinpcarter,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! MarchionessGrey (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)