User talk:Kevinwenke

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Kuru talk  19:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Qualifs
I do not think that we need separate articles for designations which are only offered by The Americal College - Wikipedia is not a course guide. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Global wealth trade


A tag has been placed on Global wealth trade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  PK T (alk)  20:03, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Sam Kuru (talk) 01:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Ok...Are you saying my pages are "spam?" I feel the content I wrote on my site is accurate and precise without any sales language. I feel I am a good reference for these topics based on my experience. The pages need work and I saw it as an opportunity to position myself as an authority.


 * If I may, please let me explain myself, my edits and who I am. I feel the reversion are not in the best interest if the project. I can reference a book I helped write for Gold Coast Schools in Miami for some of these too. It is the second largest insurance licensing entity in the US behind Kaplan. Selfishly, I didn't use this book as a reference since I am not the author and like I mentioned, I do want the authority of being referenced on Wikipedia.


 * With the revisions back to the way they were, the whole life insurance and universal life definitions you changed back to are incomplete. If you look at what I wrote, you'll see the improvement. I feel you removed everything without reviewing them.


 * The long-term care hybrid policy you reverted back to needed a citation and i improved the way it was stated.
 * The disability over-head I improved and it needed a reference. I had esophageal cancer and had a claim on mine so I know exactly how that coverage works and what it oes/doesn't cover...I knew before I had a claim too but I experienced the benefit first hand which made me believe in it more.


 * Individual disability on the page was ok, so I didn't change anything.


 * The return of premium term life insurance picture I made for Wikipedia. I don't use Canva much but was sorta proud of it. I should have, and can take my logo off of it so it can go on the page. I decided to make it today specifically for Wikipedia to explains how that product works and how it is designed. In the picture, I took into consideration one year term, level term and I added opportunity cost which is an important consideration when considering purchasing that coverage (I've never placed one of those policies because they aren't good for consumers.) ::I feel the picture can help people see it.
 * Also, I can make other non-branded picture for Wikipedia too to make one year term and level term more understandable. They are in my canva if you feel they'd add value to the project. If you don't think they'd bring clarity, no problem.


 * Please understand, I'm not just some new agent trying to spam links. I'm a life and health insurance instructor for Gold Coast Schools in Miami, a CLU and a CFP with a MBA. Ive Written 3 books on insurance and investing. I've taught thousands of people on these topics.


 * I know people (like students learning to become agents in Fl) come to Wikipedia for info on these products and I view what is on the site as incomplete and sometimes, inaccurate (like the definition of universal life insurance you reverted back to...it is ART and cash value...and it isnt permanent as it could end up being worthless as that term cost eats into the cash value.)


 * Yes, I do want people to see I edited those pages. I do understand the SEO but they do drive traffic to my site. So I admit I don't do this completely altruistic. Having the references does increase authority. I also wanted to help.


 * I feel you will have a hard time finding a source who understands these products better than I do who, who also has experienced their benefit by having claims against them, who can also teach people what they are so they understand how they work.


 * If I can help the project be better on these pages, I want to help. I would like some references so forgive me if I placed to many of them towards my site.


 * If you are open to a discussion I would appreciate it :)


 * Regards,
 * Kevin


 * Kevinwenke (talk) 02:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am saying that's spam. Your self-published material does not constitute a reliable source for the purposes of this project, and it is highly promotional. You are welcome to improve any articles you wish, but you must do so with reliable sourcing and avoid your clear conflict of interest. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)