User talk:Kevinyesu/sandbox

Test

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes, everything in the article is relevant to the World Indigenous Games. Nothing seems to be out of topic, therefore nothing was distracting.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The article was last edited on the 12th of December 2018, at 11:16. Despite this being recent, there is no details about the 2017 World Indigenous Games in Alberta, Canada. The 2017 event in Alberta is just quickly listed as one of the two World Indigenous Games, and does not give any further details on the event (number of participants, number of countries participating, games played, etc.). Additionally, there are very brief descriptions of only three traditional games. Expanding on these games, as well as adding more traditional games to the list will provide the reader a better understanding of the World Indigenous Games. Lastly, not all of the 30 countries that participated in the 2015 World Indigenous Games are listed (and there is no mention of the countries that participated in the 2017 Games).

What else could be improved? The overall text was a bit unorganized and not easy to read. Sentences/paragraphs are not transitioned well, making it a bit hard to read and follow.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes, the article is neutral and does not make any biased claims.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Quoted directly from the Wikipedia article: “Overall these Olympics are not about competition but are about celebration.” I believe this topic is under-represented in the article. It is just mentioned and does not expand on why/how the games were more focused on celebrations rather than competitions. This is a big component of the World Indigenous Games and one of the biggest element that differentiates it from the Olympic Games.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Tecnologia, CRP. "The Games". www.i-games2015.com. Retrieved 2016-05-17. This website is non-existent, and the domain is up for sale. This is used three times to reference a claim. Spencer.B (2001). Not sure who is Spencer, where/when did he claim what the article is referencing, and how to see if the information is true since that is the complete reference that appears.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Other than the ones listed above, the references seem appropriate. The sources seem to be reliable and have a neutral point of view. The information comes from articles written by reputable organizations such as The Guardian and even includes a scholarly article.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? No talk about how to represent this topic.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is part of 3 WikiProjects (Brazil, Ethnic Groups, and Multi-Sport Events) – all three rated as start-class, low importance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinyesu (talk • contribs) 19:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Matt peer review
Good addition of information concerning was is the World Indigenous Games.

Maybe provide more information in the traditional games section. More detail around the games? Are these the only games in the World Indigenous Games?

Would be interesting if you could add some results from past World Indigenous Games.

Mavinstar (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)