User talk:Kewmon

kewmon

Speedy deletion of Tamooz marketing and communications
A tag has been placed on Tamooz marketing and communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  15:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Bank Leumi
Hi Kewmon! Please stop adding the controversial statement about Bank Leumi. To add this, you should provide a reliable source. The Bible, aside from not being a reliable source, does not say anything about Bank Leumi not honoring the shmita year. I have again reverted your edit and would appreciate if you didn't edit war with other editors. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 00:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Kewmon! A personal blog is not 'an academic source', as you say. Please stop edit-warring and self-revert. If you fail to do this, you may be blocked for editing in accordance with the three-revert rule policy. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 00:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. If by 'academic sources' you are referring to the book titled Consumer Bankruptcy in Global Perspective, then it has absolutely nothing to do with Bank Leumi (much like the Bible) and is therefore not a valid source for the claims you are putting forth. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 00:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * More sources are always welcome, but before proceeding, you should take a look at some guidelines on Wikipedia, especially on the use of referenecs (some links above). Help:Footnotes may be helpful for learning how to format references.
 * I have just checked out the book reference you provided (again) and found nothing related to Bank Leumi. I am sorry that I cannot read the entire book (20 pages is also too much for a small addition like this), and would be glad if you pointed me to a specific page/paragraph in the book which corroborates your claims. Alternatively, you may provide another reliable source.
 * -- Ynhockey (Talk) 02:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi again! Please note that simply disagreeing with a statement in the article does not warrant the inclusion of a similarly misleading and unsourced statement, poorly written and formatted to boot. If you have problems with English, I will be happy to assist (just provide the Hebrew for what you want to insert here).
 * As for what you need to source, the answer is everything. Nothing about your addition was sourced, and none of the links provided (for example, the one about US law) had anything to do with Bank Leumi. Some of the text itself also had little to do with Bank Leumi, namely,
 * Debtors Prison is a controversial legal issue in Israel[3]. Israel is the sole Western country that still imprisons debtors. In comparison the United States Constitution addresses this situation and similiar ones in the 8th Amendment [4]banning cruel and unusual punishment.
 * Next, you sourced the passage Bank Leumi's current debt collection methods through the Magistrates offices as allowed by Israeli law include to a paper by a university student (correct me if I'm wrong), which moreover has absolutely nothing with Bank Leumi, and does not mention it a single time. Finally, you sourced the final statement with a personal blog.
 * In other words, all of the sources you provided are invalid for Bank Leumi and should be replaced with reliable sources directly dealing with the bank and its alleged practices. Anything else is a violation of the WP:SYNTH policy.
 * Finally, please take care to format your writing properly so that it's easier for other editors to inspect. Even valid edits may be reverted due to bad writing (grammar, style or formatting). I have also added a 'citation needed' tag to the statement you disagree with. It can be removed, but it is not as controversial as the practices you accuse Bank Leumi of, so I don't believe it warrants outright deletion right now. If a source is not provided by someone however, it will be deleted as well.
 * Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 17:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ethnoreligious group, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. NebY (talk) 23:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)