User talk:KeyanFretwell

Impressive UK map
I am very impressed with your map of the UK within the EU. I was wondering if you could do the same for other large EU member states such as France, Poland, Germany, Spain, Italy, Romania ect. Cheers Ijanderson (talk) 00:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:McCook.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:McCook.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 01:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Alan Sugar
Hi, whatever his religion, it needs a source, and this is a WP:BLP. If we can't source either Jewish or Atheist, it's better to leave that field blank. Over to you. Rodhull andemu  21:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to the Kanye West article. Such edits are considered vandalism, and are reverted. Continued vandalism on your part to Wikipedia will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia, temporarily or permanently. Flyer22 (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

File:1220281192605.JPEG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1220281192605.JPEG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 10:54, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:RockCity.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RockCity.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rose Funeral
A tag has been placed on Rose Funeral, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GregJackP (talk) 16:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rose Funeral
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rose Funeral. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Rose Funeral. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)