User talk:Keyesie

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Tommy Robinson (activist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 17:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Want to explain me to me how you think tommy Robison is far right ? Keyesie (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)


 * This has been the subject of a lot of discussion at Talk:Tommy Robinson (activist). The Wikipedia article gives a summary of what reliable secondary sources say, and the opening sentence gives numerous sources for this, including Reuters, The Times and Newsweek.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 18:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Well if you want actually read the proper News and videos they say he isn’t far right Keyesie (talk) 19:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-47926338/gerard-batten-tommy-robinson-not-far-right Keyesie (talk) 08:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

There’s a article by the bbc claim g he isn’t far right Keyesie (talk) 08:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Then take it to thew talk page.Slatersteven (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 13:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

By the way, if I had realised you had already been warned I would have reported you, revert again and I will.Slatersteven (talk) 13:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Tommy Robinson (activist). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)