User talk:Keyriambrocio/sandbox

Peer Review by Catherine: 1. The edits made sound neutral. no biased language is used; the edits sound like an entry within an encyclopedia. The sources that a re used appear to also be unbiased, so there is no opinion evident within the edits. 2. The citations are placed correctly within the edits. There is also a significant amount of citations included. 3. The edit is a significant amount of data that feels quite substantial within the article as a whole. I feel the information being added is relevant and needs to be included. Each edit has a strong amount of factual information, making it a substantial edit, along with one or two citations to back up the info. 4. In regard to the language, I feel that everything is worded clearly and in a professional manner. The sentence structure is strong and the sentences flow nicely. I did not see any grammatical/ spelling errors. Cpara2 (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I will try adding more citations to see if any more are needed with different sources to make sure I am getting a variety different perspectives. I will also try to find more information to add to this article edit because the genocide is relevant to the Mayan people's     history. I will continue to make sure that any information added is unbiased and neutral, following the Wikipedia guidelines. I will see if I can make any changes to the sentence structure to make sure that it is still clear, easy to understand, and well-written. Thanks again. Keyriambrocio (talk) 16:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

peer review by Krizzia 1. is an unbiased source. it has good information 2. the citations are good and related to the topic 3. it does feel substantial. it includes both text and citation 4. is very clear and well understood. you this a great job in this article. the information is very good Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kryan8 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I will continue to add more information where necessary and include citations with all information added. I will also make sure that the information added comes from unbiased, reliable sources. I also think it's important that my other edits are clear and easy to     understand with no spelling or grammatical errors. Thanks again. Keyriambrocio (talk) 17:09, 1 May 2018 (UTC)