User talk:Kges1901/2015/April

Talk page for Rhabdidae
Hi, I noticed you recently created a talk page for the article on Rhabdidae— thanks for that! However, I also noticed that the talk page suggests that the taxonomic group belongs to the gastropods. This is not so: the rahbdidae are scaphopods, at the same taxonomic level as (and entirely distinct from) the gastropods. Then again, there is no current wikiproject for the scaphopods. It is believed that the scaphopods are more closely related to the cephalopods than other molluscan groups... Thoughts on this? KDS 4444 Talk  11:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Bachtold (April 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oo7565 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Bachtold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Kges1901 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Oo7565&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Kges1901 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oo7565 (talk) 01:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Aulacophora approximata
Hi! I noticed that you have created the talk page for the article Aulacophora approximata. Just wanted to tell you, when tagging beetle-related articles there is no point in putting the animal tag too. Thanks! Gug01 (talk) 22:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

ESTIMATOR SOFTWARE
Hi, I think you have mistakenly made my page marked as deleted. The reason behind the page is kept is, The Project "ESTIMATOR" is the work of 5 students who have worked day night to make the calulcations easier in case of estimating the quantities for the construction works. Even there are lot's of civil engineers whom spend their lot's of time in creating such heavy duty estimates. It's necessary to know them. Even also it is necesarry to show the prcence of a organization who works for all of the civil engineers. I don't think you are wrong to flag my page but by mistake it happens. I wish you understood what i want to say :) Estimator Software — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhishekBagul (talk • contribs) 10:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Estimator does not meet's the notability guidelines It is satisfying all the notability gidelines i guess.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhishekBagul (talk • contribs) 10:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Timeline of the Syrian Civil War (April 2015 – present)
Hi,

I am aware of the fact that another page already exists, but that page is going to be renamed to (August 2014 - March 2015), and the timeline should continue on the new page because the other one is already too big.--JuznaAfrika (talk) 11:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy tagging
Hi. Thanks for patrolling new pages, but there are some problems with the way you are doing it. If you are going to patrol new pages (which is a very good and useful activity), read WP:NPP for advice, and also read WP:CSD carefully so that you know what the valid speedy-deletion criteria are. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You wrote . You should never normally need to use "db-reason" - a speedy-deletion nomination should be for one of the reasons listed at WP:CSD, and all that is necessary is to write db-a7 or, preferably, one of the more specific reasons listed there like db-person or db-corp.
 * Being a movie review is not actually a speedy-deletion reason. Films, books, music etc are not covered by db-a7 - if they need to be deleted, you have to use WP:PROD or WP:AFD.
 * However, very often if you feed a sentence from a review-type article into Google, you find that it has been copied from a newspaper review or IMDb, and needs speedy-deleting as a copyvio. That was the case here, so I have deleted it. The right db tag would have looked like

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Bachtold has been accepted
 Henry Bachtold, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  14:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Kges1901 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.