User talk:Kges1901/2016/July

Your GA nomination of Divisional Cavalry Regiment (New Zealand)
The article Divisional Cavalry Regiment (New Zealand) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Divisional Cavalry Regiment (New Zealand) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 11:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

WOC and 28th Army
Many thanks for your continuing hard work, especially with the HSUs. In accordance with WP:MILMOS, we should probably go ahead and merge the 28th Army into the WOC(B) article. Do you wish to do that or shall I? Buckshot06 (talk) 03:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 28th Army had three formations, but only the third has a connection to the WOC. I don't know what the current practice is in dealing with this issue of multiple formations with the same name. Kges1901 (talk) 08:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Take a look at 20th Guards Motor Rifle Division (merged), or 65th Army and North Western Operational Command (not merged). Basically I've been the one setting the standards, and they're not all aligned fully, because there are so many Soviet formations. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * So what is your recommendation for cases like this? IMO, 65th Army should really be merged with NWOC, given that the 65th Army had only one formation, and that article does not even cover the army's postwar service. Kges1901 (talk) 07:46, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Suggest we do yes merge 65A and NWOC. What would be your opinion on 28A and WOC? Buckshot06 (talk) 03:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * IMO we should not merge 28th Army and WOC because it would give the impression that all 3 formations of the 28th Army have lineage connection to WOC. Kges1901 (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, we can do it that way. Does make some sense since the Soviets did make quite clear their First Formation / Second Formation / Third Formation distinctions etc. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Divisional Cavalry Regiment (New Zealand) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Kges1901, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 10:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Divisional Cavalry Regiment (New Zealand)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Leonid Solodkov
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Regards, KC Velaga  ☚╣✉╠☛  13:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)