User talk:Kges1901/2017/January

2016 Year in Review

 * Thanks, Tomstar81. The recognition was entirely unexpected and a pleasant surprise. Kges1901 (talk) 09:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Rescuing dead links

 * Maybe it's just the way different minds work, but it seems to me that when adding an archived link to rescue a dead URL, the access date should be the date the archive was accessed, not the date (if given) the original web page was accessed. To see what I'm talking about, take a look at 414th Fighter Group's references. Somehow, an access date of 14 September 2013 for a URL created on 18 August 2016 (the archive date) seems inconsistent. Any thoughts?  --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see an inconsistency here because the archived page is pretty much the same as it was on the original access date in most of these cases. However, if you want to change the dates, I won't oppose. Kges1901 (talk) 09:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Am working on a Review of this article, there are a few issues that need some editorial attention before I can make further progress. Shearonink (talk) 04:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Great work as always Kges1901. If the 55th RD was disbanded in the mid 1950s, when and how did the 55th Naval Infantry Division in the Pacific reform? Buckshot06 (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Feskov et al 2013 has an entire section (Appendix 4.9) about the 55th Naval Infantry Division. It was formed in 1968 at Vladivostok, and if I read the translation right, in Chapter 4, Section 2, Feskov claims that the 55th Naval Infantry did not inherit the lineage of the 55th RD, despite veterans' claims. Kges1901 (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That has parallels in the West. Reuse of a related designation (the number 55, which did have a sea service riflemen association), but not formal assignment of the lineage. Many of the ordinary rifle division numbers would have been available for reuse. I would probably put, if you have any priorities available in your work queue, the current 155th Guards Red Banner Naval Infantry Brigade in the Pacific first, and then we can use that as a home for added data on the 55 NID December 1967-1 June 2009 (http://www.ww2.dk/new/navy/55dmp.htm) at some point. Cheers and many thanks for your hard work as always, Buckshot06 (talk) 12:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of August Kork
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article August Kork you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Newspapers.com and The Wikipedia Library
Your account is ready and should be live now! Happy editing! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 15th Tank Corps (Soviet Union)
The article 15th Tank Corps (Soviet Union) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:15th Tank Corps (Soviet Union) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Disband dates for Soviet RDs
Grand work, great for adding the red-hot-off the press data to the 1980s (P&C) listing.. !! Buckshot06 (talk) 13:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of August Kork
The article August Kork you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:August Kork for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Review Question
Hello, Kges1901. I noticed you recently reviewed the article Battle of Gawakuke. I'm still new around Wikipedia, so I don't completely understand the review process, but would you mind letting me know what prevented the article from getting a B-Class rating? According to the previous reviewer, the only problem with it was the citation style, which I believe I've corrected. If not, could you explain to me how exactly to do that. Thanks, Washoe the Wise (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)