User talk:Kgj08

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 00:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Yamara ✉  06:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ixfd64 (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Yamara ✉  23:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Cf. your comments on talk page "NEED TO BE SHUT DOWN". Also, please don't remove cited material. '' Yamara ✉  19:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. -MBK004 23:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, removing referenced information without an edit summary does seem suspicious, wouldn't you agree? -MBK004 23:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Brad?
Is this Brad H. from UD? - Schrandit (talk) 16:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I saw you're contribution to the UD talk page. You seem to have racked up a fair number of warnings on here.  Try to take it slow, you will get things done, I promise you.  I recently waged a "long war" on the Illegal immigration to the United States page.  It took some time and there is still work to be done but it is headed in the right direction.  In terms of dispelling propaganda on wikipedia your most powerful tool is the citation needed tag.  Half the things on wikipeida are not properly sourced, political propaganda never is - when ever you come across something blatantly made up hit it was a citation needed tag, give them the chance to cite it and when they don't take it down.  If things are cited look at the sources, I do that from time to time and sometimes they're either highly unreliable organizations or the source does not support the statement.  Keep fighting the good fight, see you around campus. - Schrandit (talk) 20:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, might want to vote on this. Voting is important. - Schrandit (talk) 20:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

About Douglas Wilder
Hey Kgj08.I saw that you didn't understood why Douglas Wilder was count african-american.Because of the racial system of USA (in this case the one drop rule) wikipedia tends to respect the racial system of the countries.So of course that he is bi-racial but in USA by the one drop rule he is consider black. Augusto —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.17.99.243 (talk) 01:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Brit Hume has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  —Ketan Panchal t aL K   21:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Elonka 21:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)