User talk:Kgriffisgreenberg

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Interregnum regent has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Arienh4(Talk) 14:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

km
My issue was about removing the links. If there is something you want to improve then fix it.Gloriamerrier (talk) 17:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

=
=== The links are no longer valid as pertains to this article. The information is outdated and incorrect. I have explained this under the talk section]. There are no links within Wikipedia to the bibliography I gave, and I did check.

I corrected the information in the article as is scholarly and best known, and gave bibliographic support for what I changed. You changed the article and reverted it back to information which is invalid, as best as I can see.

I am not a continuous editor to this group. I looked over the article, and saw some significant errors and corrected as best as possible. (Kgriffisgreenberg (talk) 18:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC))


 * You do know how to edit or read a wikipedia page correct? You do not list references and book pages next to the words in the paragraph. you link it to the page as a footnote. click on the footnotes in the article and it will take you to the bottom of the page titled references: you only gave 2 of them from Gardiner 2005 (1957) and its all there 129.10.104.191 (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There are various styles of referencing, the important thing is consistency. See WP:CITE. You can of course have Harvard style references at the end of a sentence without footnotes, the IP is wrong about this. And the most recent edit by removed the book details, it certainly isn't 'all there'. Dab's reverted her, saying "(this is about I6. What is a "black (hieroglyph)"?)". He's changed the title to Km (hieroglyph). Dougweller (talk) 21:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

You also need to read WP:3RR so that you don't end up having problems the way the other editor did. I'd advise you to wait until 24 hours after your last edit yesterday, as I will certainly do. A bit of a pain but not often an issue. Dougweller (talk) 10:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)