User talk:Kguirnela/Archive 6

Hiligaynon Wikipedia interface translation
Hi Professor Kurt Mascuñana Guirnela,

You have been granted translator priviledges here.

There are still 1768 messages remaining to be translated (See these rankings). I have already helped translate 146 of those messages (8% of the total) thanks to your kind help.

Good Luck with the translation effort! --Jose77 (talk) 22:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I am in the process of translating the system messages. &mdash; • Kurt Guirnela •  ‡ Feedback  01:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Userbox
Ok, thanks, I'll consider it. Spencer T♦C 01:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

User Category for Discussion
 A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies. This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page. VegaDark (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. Seems reasonable. &mdash; • Kurt Guirnela •  ‡ Feedback  10:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Common citation templates
Thank you so much, Prof. Guirnela! :) I am basically new to wikipedia. These templates would be of great help for me. Have a good day! :) Ano ang chansa ta Nong mag campeón? :) --Bacoleño (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. Champion in which contest? &mdash; • Kurt Guirnela •  ‡ Feedback  02:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hello! User:Howard the Duck corrected the title Judicial Executive Legislative Advisory and Consultative Council. I am glad that you helped in this first in our legal history MOA. The only problem I myself encountered, is that the government used a non-Wiki very long title. I myself could not easily memorize this. For example, I typed Jelac in Wiki search and I found nothing. I can't remember the title, so I have to go to my own contributions. There must be some remedy for this. But I am not familiar with Wiki processes, since I am a beginner here. My point is, if it is possible for you to find a way that readers or lawyers will easily find this article in search engine without typing the very long title. Is it possible to type Jelac and be re-directed to this title. Just asking, anyway. Regards. --Florentino floro (talk) 11:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It's been done. I created a redirect to the main article using the acronym "Jelac". You can now type "Jelac" in the search box and you'll get redirected to Judicial Executive Legislative Advisory and Consultative Council. You can also read WP:REDIRECT to learn about creating redirects. Happy editing! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  11:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much. Actually, I tried 2 times yesterday to type on search, and I failed; so I copy pasted the exact words from Gma report and I got it. This demonstrates that your re-direct edit, would be a great help to our legal community, especially to professors and jurists plus bar examinees. This article might be a bar question. Regards. --Florentino floro (talk) 07:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Jelacc and Jelac
I just noticed today that it is Jelacc but papers use Jelac. So, may I again visit you and quote my message to this kind user who alerted me of this. I typed Jelacc in Wiki search but it won't re-direct. "Hi User:Richarddr1234. Thanks for contributing to Jelac or Jelacc. Even if I created the article, I just noticed only now that the acronym is Jelacc, even if the papers or the S.C. would call it Jelac. So, I asked the kindness of Kurt to re-direct Jelac to the article since the title is too, too long. In fact, I told Kurt the problem of the legal community and of myself in looking for this by typing the title in Wiki search engine but I failed 3 x, so I had to go to my contributions. Maybe, let us ask the help of Kurt to include Jelacc in re-direct so that if a jurist or reader would type Jelacc in Wiki search, it would also re-direct there." Regards. --Florentino floro (talk) 08:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Now, whether you key-in "Jelac" or "Jelacc", you'll get re-directed to the correct article. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  10:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

That "was" the Official Site
We have been commissioned by the Tourism Department of the City to revamp their online campaign and exhibit the city in a better light. 38 programmers, web-developers, animators and art-directors both local and international were paid by the city government of Roxas City to build its new online home at http://www.roxascityrealestates.com. dot-Gov-dot-ph is a pseudo dot-Ph domain, it is in fact a private American-owned hosting company that has been monopolizing its rates and policies recently. Roxas City wants to opt-out of this monopolizing scenario and has made plans of transferring its domain early on before being manipulated unwittingly by American net industries. And please!! Was that site in your estimation befitting of the word "official"? "Kung kacheapan ang taste sang mga taga-Bacolod, indi ya pagpapareho-a ang Roxas City itsoy!" (If your local culture has less sophisticated taste, do not think that others would share the same, young man.) 121.1.45.2 (talk) 01:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Mariter Barrios Bermejo
 * Let us limit our discussion to what matters. Personal views and biases have no bearing here in Wikipedia. We advocate a neutral point of view. I am not interested in arguing the moot point of who is "cheap" or "cool". As a Wikipedian, I am merely interested in the facts and upholding the Wikipedian culture. You can't blame me for having the mindset that all LGU's have a ".gov.ph" domain. That is only logical. Do not take it as a personal affront when your edits got reverted, it happens all the time; you are not a registered user and simply use an anonymous IP – for all I knew your edits might be those of some pimply high school kid from who knows where. If you do register as a Wikipedia user, you'll have more credibility. But the main point is, communicate with the editors here in Wikipedia. If you objected to the reverts, you could have left a message in the article's talk page the first time, explaining your edits. Wikipedians always go by consensus. Even as an anon IP user you have that right to have your opinion heard. But we do it in a civil manner. Now that you have explained your edits, I'll let it stand. Isn't civility a beautiful thing? =) I have been to Roxas City, several times over the years, and have been impressed by the manners of the people I have interacted with in that city; cultured, polite and refined. Oh, one thing more – I am a Silaynon, and not from Bacolod. Cheers and happy editing! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  08:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Kurt, a pimply high-school kid from who-knows where, have as much credibility to contribute and edit. Your biases betrays how much you evaluate and appraise things, which applies to all other aspects in your dealings: not only in this scenario but with how you easily dismiss and classify circumstances based on hasty prejudices and uncareful consideration. Using good judgment to consider likely consequences dictates that a thorough investigation and presumption of good faith (irregardless of class or looks or pimples or age) must be engendered before one acts accordingly. It's a pity, I find you cute pa naman. I know that's a personal comment, but i'm a very frank person. But yes I do. At age 37. Wow, you still look hot. Especially in that shot when you were in the hospital. I bet the nurses were giggling to give you a little massage. And lastly, never undersestimate pimply high-school kids. Especially kids. Geniuses and leaders can come from their ranks. You were once a kid. Never discredit adolescents and the youth. Adults who have no respect for them do not deserve any as well. "Unless ye become a child, like this, ye shall never enter the kingdom of heaven..." Smile. You look cuter that way. I hope you're not yet married. And i love calling you "Itsoy." So don't take that offensively.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.45.2 (talk) 10:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I never take offense on Wikipedia; otherwise I would have hid behind an anonymous username. The reason for that is simple; I am here to contribute, not to come into conflict with other people. However, the issue is not about me. I am a teacher; I am much aware of the youth's potential; I never underestimate them. Some are fountains of knowledge, the source of my pride as their mentor. Some, however, are capable of oh so evil creations. Just like adults. =) Hmmm... Maybe those WikiPilipinas people were right all along; there's no such thing as a completely neutral point of view. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  22:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as complete neutrality. It's an ideal, but hardly close to anything physically possible...well, relative at least to human culture and social consciousness. Love, for one, is never neutral. And at the point of orgasm, the Self completely forgets everything and is solely preoccupied with enjoying that three-second moment of bliss. There is no such thing as neutrality. Humans would always make things personal. The sense of the Self and self-preservation would always be preeminent than any other communal and shared ethos and disciplines. Neutral or not, I think you're really attractive. Reminds me of Professor Lupin in J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter. Roughly handsome and ravenous in bed. Very sexy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.45.2 (talk) 05:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh well, you can't blame one for aspiring to achieve a higher plane of existence. Hmm... I wonder what your Patronus would be. =) &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  06:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thedawn.PNG)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Thedawn.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  03:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Razorblogo.JPG)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Razorblogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 02:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  03:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

gracias
Pare! thanks for all your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rynldo (talk • contribs) 05:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You are most welcome. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  05:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Alexander Flor image
Thank you, sir. Still feeling my way through.Ems amoloza (talk) 06:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Just give me a buzz if you hit any snags. Happy editing! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  08:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Care-Diamonds--Emeral-227566.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Care-Diamonds--Emeral-227566.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  02:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sword1.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Sword1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  Speak!  02:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

DYK Nomination
Hi. I've nominated Mendiola massacre, an article you created, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, Thingg &#8853; <sup style="color:#ff0033;">&#8855;  03:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, that was quick. =) Thanks for the heads-up. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  03:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Mendiola massacre

 * Thanks for the heads-up. =) &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  06:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Translation of the Hiligaynon Interface messages
Greetings Kguirnela,

Although there are still 1730 untranslated messages left, only the 329 most used messages need to be translated.

When all the 329 "most used messages" have been translated into Hiligaynon then the Request for the Creation of Hiligaynon Wikipedia would qualify for Approval. --Jose77 (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I will eventually get around to translating those most used messages. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  03:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I know they're not critiques
And yes, I know it's nothing personal, but I would have appreciated it if you had added an additional citation or reference to the article, instead of putting back the notice on the heading that a previous guy already did. That's what I meant. Thanks. Ruffyuppie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruffyuppie (talk • contribs) 15:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh I see, some other editor already did what I did beforehand. No harm, no foul. Cheers! PS: Btw, don't forget to sign your posts with four tildes, like so: ~ . Damn, that SineBot is quick. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  15:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Invitation
Hi! maxsch created an RFC for myself User:Florentino floro - Requests for comment/Florentino floro I would appreciate it if you would take a look. Max created this upon message to my adopting parent User:Diligent Terrier here vis-a-vis the pending User:Diligent Terrier/Florentino floro and Maxschmelling (created on 18:38, 18 May 2008 by Diligent Terrier) Thanks.--Florentino floro (talk) 05:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I'll pass on this matter. My views may not be un-biased. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  03:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Judiel Nieva DYK

 * Thanks! Lenticel does it again. =) &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  01:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Csabcoatofarms.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Csabcoatofarms.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. Even bots deserve civility. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  05:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I notice that you've marked some images for speedy deletion lately as a duplicate of some other image. Please note that to qualify for speedy deletion, the duplicate images must be in the same file format. If one image is a PNG and the other a JPG, then it isn't possible to do a speedy deletion. I've had to remove some of your speedy deletion requests as a result.

If you're not sure whether images are duplicates, you can check at the bottom of the page where any duplicates will appear. You can also list unused images at Images and media for deletion, or if an image is not used on any page and is under a claim of fair use, you can tag it as {{subst:orfud}} for deletion in 7 days. Stifle (talk) 09:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm... mea culpa. I think I'll list those under IfD. Cheers! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  09:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Or... since they're logos and are under a claim of fair use I'll use the {{subst:orfud}} template instead. Thanks! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  09:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

In RE: Lapu-Lapu
My reasons for reverting and/or editing assertions that Lapu-lapu was a Muslim are on the article's talk page. Edits made by me are in no way acts of vandalism. As I've said, unless proponents of the argument can present literature on the matter from verifiable sources other than from just a website, I will edit out such an assumption. But if in fact proponents of the argument can present literature from verifiable sources, I will accede and respect the proposition. In the mean time. Don't be to quick to judge that such an edit was an act of vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdvl (talk • contribs) 15:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank you for initiating discussion regarding the article. My concern is with your quick judgment that the provided refs are not verifiable and subsequent removal of such referenced lines are not in keeping with Wikipedia policy. I will now initiate a WP:NPOV dispute by appending a POV tag to the article. However, I need to revert the article back to its original state before your deletion, in order for the other editors participating in the NPOV dispute to judge for themselves the merit of the disputed lines. Please refrain from removing those lines until consensus has been reached. I apologize if I interpreted your actions as vandalism. Cheers! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  01:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Please visit this and see if you can make it better, etc. in IT - GSIS-Meralco bribery case--Florentino floro (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Made some minor cosmetic tweaks; all that legalese gave me a nosebleed however. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  01:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Sago
Hi. I am sorry you didn't like my removing the image of pearl sago from Taho; I added the image to Sago, where it is far more relevant. --Una Smith (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello, I do believe the image is relevant to the article, as pearl sago is one of Taho's ingredients. If you feel that this is not so, feel free to remove it again. Cheers! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  01:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal negros occidental silay.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal negros occidental silay.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Addressed August 11, 2008. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  06:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tallan Latz
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tallan Latz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Troikoalogo (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  06:31, 10 September 2008 (UTC)