User talk:Khaderv

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Khaderv! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! JCutter (talk) 03:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Some changes to external links you have created
Khaderv - again, welcome and thank you for all your contributions. I have found many of the internal wikilinks that you have provided to be quite useful and relevant (cross linking among multiple financial pages, whose terminology can be quite confusing). However I have also noticed that you are including what appears to be a document that you have published yourself (specifically this)on multiple pages. I have already reverted these changes on a few of the pages including:


 * CUSIP
 * Market identification code
 * Ticker symbol

I have done this because, while related, the presentation may violate (either in fact or in spirit) some of Wikipedia's policies.

I wondering if you have read through Wikipedia's policy on Original Research - Citing oneself and if they qualify as a reliable source under the verifiability policy. They may also be in violation of the external link policy.

The general guideline for self published sources is:
 * Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work 'in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications'''. However, caution should be exercised when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so.

''

Respectfully, to be quite honest, it kind of looks like you are trying to promote your own page by using Wikipedia. This practice is not allowed (see WP:SPAM) and it also doesn't work in practice because links in Wikipedia don't help your search engine ranking (see here).

If I have misinterpreted your posts please let me know. Otherwise, can I politely suggest that you try to clean up some of your other external link posts yourself.

Thanks again. JCutter (talk) 03:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Reverted the rest of them
Also reverted:


 * International Securities Identifying Number
 * Financial market
 * Reuters Instrument Code
 * Financial Information eXchange
 * ISO 10383
 * International Securities Identifying Number

JCutter (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Response

 * Thank you for your message. I am sorry I might have over looked wikipedia policies. I just took some of the wikpedia pages as samples. I saw many similar external links so I felt I could add mine. Just to clear up I am definitely NOT trying to promote myself. I am a practitioner working for wall street firms for last 15+ years. As you mihgt have noticed many financial market topics on Wikipedia are incomplete and they are missing practical aspects. So I felt like contributing to my best.


 * Just to let you know the two links I have are unique and they are my own. You can google it, I don’t think you will find the documents like them. They are produced out of my experience. I had many workshops on those topics to many working professionals. I will remove them earliest possible.


 * To know more about me you can visit my Linkedin page http://www.linkedin.com/in/khadershaik. Please let me know if there is any thing I should know.

Khader Shaik (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Managing Derivatives Contracts


The article Managing Derivatives Contracts has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "An article on a seemingly non-notable book, written by the author of the book. There are no valid sources in the article. Searches turned up no kind of coverage or reviews, meaning its a failure of WP:NBOOK and the WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Managing Derivatives Contracts Bookcover.png
Thanks for uploading File:Managing Derivatives Contracts Bookcover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 16:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)