User talk:Khaled Abolaynain

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Khaled Abolaynain! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:10, Friday, September 30, 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amr Awadallah


The article Amr Awadallah has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Amr Awadallah, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Kerry Lee Crawford
Draft:Kerry Lee Crawford, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kerry Lee Crawford and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kerry Lee Crawford during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Kerry Lee Crawford
Well, one thing you shouldn't have done was to recreate the article in exactly the same words; I've now deleted it again. You say that you wrote it from scratch, but I've compared it with the version that was deleted after discussion and it is virtually identical. How did you manage to come up with exactly the same wording? Deb (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I notice that the draft article was rejected and I don't see any sign of anyone having reviewed it. Who was the person you think carried out a review and said it was all right? Deb (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * To find out what is wrong with it, read the comments from the original deletion discussion here. Deb (talk) 19:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The last person who touched the article tagged it as promotional. No one except you made any significant changes to the wording. What I suggest you do is create a new draft - this time not copying the words from elsewhere - and submit that for approval. Deb (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I deleted your article because it was the same as an article that was deleted following discussion. If you continue to use the same words, you will get the same result. This time demonstrate notability and do not use promotional wording and then you may be lucky and no one will nominate it for deletion. If you do what I suggested, you will be able to get opinions from other people before you try to create the article and that will save you from wasting your time. Deb (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you keep asking me the same questions over and over, you will keep getting the same answers. The draft was rejected with the explanation "Unremarkable person". You recreated it with the same content. Deb (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

COI on Asad Que
I am actually referring to Asad Que. Haven't you been paid to create that page? Also, removing data from talk page isn't allowed.Monfernape 15:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by عثمان خلیل (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Asad Que for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asad Que is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Asad Que until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 06:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Asad Que
Draft:Asad Que, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Asad Que and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Asad Que during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your article
Unfortunately what the article itself shows in its current state is not what satisfies WP:Notability because examining them shows only announcements, notices or his own words rearranged similarly, wherever published; what we actually need is serious independent major independent about him, and not something either based from press releases or anything like it. There are actually significant claims here but the article needs substantial improvements to show a convincing acceptance. Take for example, the currently offered 6 sources: 1-3 are all his profiles and 4-6 is a speech meeting; even then, all scientists or businesspeople have meetings or speeches, but not all of them are backed by genuine news coverage (listing a YouTube among his publications, of which are not immediately saying whether they confirm he's a significant figure or highly cited for them), which is why such coverage is needed here. A solution we also use here is merging to another relevant article as a section or piece, if no independent substance can be made. SwisterTwister  talk  03:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Hsypark (talk) 21:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ESMA


Hello, Khaled Abolaynain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ESMA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)