User talk:Khalibali

Hello, You recently declined my article on John W. Barber. I didn't see any notes that you left. Can you tell me why you declined it?Cmorrison3 (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Khalibali, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570384235 your edit] to Valentin Zhukovski may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * db-g1

Slow down...
I've just declined two of your speedy requests - Gareth Duke is not promotional in the slightest, and Ashkan khalkhaly claims notability, even though I have distinct doubts about its accuracy. Please take a bit of time to re-read WP:CSD. Peridon (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I've retagged Ashkan khalkhaly as a hoax. Peridon (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks For Informing me about some of my Decisions, Yes Ashkan khalkhaly does comply for Hoax. --Khali 12:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Stop
I'm calling on you to stop tagging for now. Your tags are too often not right, A Russian writer who died in 1918 cannot be promotional, railway stations are generally regarded as notable, a film studio that's demolished and totally out of action cannot be promotional. I would like you to spend some time looking at the articles at CAT:CSD. Just look, and see how they are tagged. Then see what happened. Read WP:CSD. Don't tag again today. Tagging for deletion takes skill and knowledge. You shouldn't rush into it. Same applies to working at Articles for Creation. That is an area for experienced editors. I did the watch and see thing for quite some time before I started tagging myself. Peridon (talk) 12:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on the Administrator's noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

What is going on here,. @Ponyo Sock Pupperty means Improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, or otherwise violate community standards and policies. In my contributions where i tried to deceive, disrupt or distort?


 * Review my contributions here and tell me where in the world i tried to deceive?
 * Please point out to me which part of WP:SOCK your use of multiple accounts falls under? --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Can some Admin inform the Editor why he is being blocked? Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The fact that they were blocked for the inappropriate use of multiple accounts has already been explained in the block message and my follow-up question to Khalibali above, as well as at User talk:Pakithedjay and Administrators' noticeboard. If the editor has any additional questions regarding the block they are free to ask them. Have you had communications with them that make you believe they are unaware of why they were blocked? --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Ariel Abshire
Hello Khalibali, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Ariel Abshire, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Doesn't quite qualify for A7; does make an assertion of significance, and as such, should be taken to WP:AfD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 21:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Coleoptere "reliable sources"
Hi there Khalibali, Thanks for reviewing my article submission. The three sources I cited are each known, independent, non-self-published online magazines and newsletters with their own editorial staffs. One of the three sources (Refinery29) even has its own Wikipedia page. Why are they deemed unreliable? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisabaird (talk • contribs) 22:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your future participation at Articles for creation
Crossposted to here and here.

Please read Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation (or likely archived as Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/2013 4 or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/2013 5) ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Articles_for_creation&diff=574240742&oldid=574234176 diff]) and re-familarize yourself with all Wikipedia content policies and guidelines as well as steps 1-3 in WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions before approving or decling articles in Articles for creation. I strongly recommend that you go even further and not accept or decline articles in AFC at all until you have re-established your reputation as an editor who knows and follows the rules and customs of Wikipedia, particularly those surrounding content and user behavior.

Please note that this is a personal request and I do not speak for the other editors at the WikiProject. However, in light of your recent history, I believe most active reviewers would endorse these recommendations. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  21:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Pakistan User Group
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan


'''Hi !

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive
Hi !

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)