User talk:KhanZeer

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555741404 your edit] to Ewa Sonnet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

May 18, 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Ewa Sonnet, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Ewa Sonnet. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 04:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

There was no libel or defamatory information added. If you want to police the page properly then at least remove the 1985 Birthday of Beata Victoria Dabrowska and also remove March 8th. That is a fake birthday and middle name of Kornelia is also a fake concocted by Przemek Ristok. The correct birthyear is 1983 and the correct birthplace publicly stated by Beata Dabrowska is Knurow Poland and if you go there you will find her listed as a 1983 birth. Przemek Ristok publicly released a false birthday and false birth year as cover for their involvement in illicit activity that have been going on prior to Beata Dabrowska becoming a Topless model and singer.

Ironically the user that reported it to you is non other than the fan that interviewed her for his College News station before proposing to her as correctly stated in the edit he wanted wiped.

While there is no widely available public discussion of their involvement in Human trafficking, they are actually being investigated for trafficking by the Interpol and Przemek Ristok did spend time in a German jail for drug trafficking back in the 90's. Providing the criminal background of a person on Wikipedia is not defemation!

Allegedly, they are low level foot soldier type employees in a very dangerous human trafficking organizations. The delay in their prosecution may be related to the length of the investigation against the major players. Yes it is quiet shocking that someone seemingly so innocent could be a human trafficker but the truth is sometimes stranger and more vile than any fiction.

The Interpol report is real and it does contain the picture of the secret out of wedlock daughter that the adulterous couple hide from the world.

Her picture was provided to the user that reported this edit as proof that the Interpol report is real. The Music celebrity who got hold of report will have their name kept private, since it would be unwise to allow the Polish couple to physically threaten a public figure such as the celebrity like they have repeatedly threatened the now dead relative.

If you want more proof on that end, contact Facebook and have them pull all the threatening messages that were sent by Przemek Ristok to a woman that was dying from cancer.

It's ironic that you are defending the rights of people being investigated for serious crimes while they could be out right now trafficking innocent women and children. One day you will discover the truth. I promise you that. Then you will know that all you were told was the truth and not libel. There is even audio evidence of Beata Dabrowska yelling at Przemek Ristok telling him that she no longer wants to be "his coworker in his shit" She said this after she mistook a mention of a child the night before when she had a stunned and fearful look on her face from the guilt that she hid. I did not even know to put 2 and 2 together until months later when the Interpol report surfaced.

The problem is I have way too much proof and one day what you reported as libel will be mentioned as news in their native country of Poland. It's ironic in today's world when the truth is seen as defamatory and lies such as a fake middle name and a fake birth year and fake birthday are left posted as wiki truths!

If you have connections with Facebook why don't you ask them to verify her fake birthday so they can provide you proof.

Yes the truth is that much stranger than fiction. be on the lookout for a film adaptation of this hard to believe true story. The title will be non other than "Piglet"

Here is the photo of their daughter from the Interpol report. Please do not share it. The girl is innocent and has nothing to do with the misdeeds of her parents.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/521/*******( edited out since being alerted this information is publicly viewable)

Notice the resemblance to the mother. This little girl is kept secret probably even from his wife. this is how sick these people are. They publicly deny the existence of their own daughter!

There is nothing that will stop the truth from coming out about these two people. Not misguided Wikipedia White Knighting nor the admins who decide what is to be done about this. One day, the whole truth about these people will be known to the world entire. They have simply offended, abused, used, and threatened violence against too many people and their day of reckoning with civilized laws is coming.

The purpose of revealing the truth and the Interpol reports on sites such as Wikipedia is for Przemek Ristok and Beata Dabrowska to think twice the next time they try to traffic an innocent woman or child like they are suspected of doing for years!

The motivation for this is just. If this revelation was in fact a lie, it would not be so vehemently defended and the reporters of the edit rebuked in such a manner. Your reporters are in error here and so will administration be once the truth about these people comes out.


 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox. I have honestly no idea what you're going on about, but it has nothing to do with our community purpose of building an encyclopedia; additionally, you are violating our policies by adding material to an article about a living person without providing verifiable sources.


 * Furthermore, it has been brought to my attention that you are misusing the "Email this user" feature to send the same screed as above to editors who are not interested in communicating with you. For these reasons:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.


 * In addition to the standard block, your access to the email user feature has been disabled. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 19:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

The email this user feature was used only to email the user that reported the content since he is also one of the editors and creators of the content and whose photo of beata Dabrowska is the official one listed now. It's ironic that I am being punished for posting a lot more facts than he has with his factually incorrect statement.

Don't you think it illogical for such editors to butt into another edit and file a claim about it then complain about being contacted by someone they filed a claim against? Real editors do not behave the same way in the real world. They confront those that contact them instead of reporting them in a cowardly fashion. After all, you did respond did you not?

Don't you consider it bias for an editor to "edit" a wiki about someone when they in fact created the content that they are referencing an incorrectly portraying?

The person who reported the page also edited it under a different pseudonym and created the content where he brandishes a wedding ring and proposes a marriage during the sham of an interview that he did with Beata Dabrowksa( Ewa Sonnet)for the College Radio station( would you like a link to his blog where he admits this? Or is that too much evidence to provide?)

Heck the editor and others who edited this wiki do not even know her real middle name is "Victoria" and not "Kornelia" as is incorrectly listed as a deception by her criminal coworker and host of a porn site Przemek Ristok.

I accept your punishment of myself but you also need to punish the ones that posted false information provided by circular references that link back to Wikipedia as authority for the false information that was created! Imagine that linking an article as a reference when the article links back to wikipedia for its reference thereby verifying absolutely nothing other than getting around the rules set by administrators!

If you think I am joking, then go to skype and search for "Beata.Victoria" user name. There you will find the model/singer's account with the fake age of 28 of course since the people that previously edited this wiki don't even have her real age birthday birthyear or place of birth correct.

This wiki article is not only inaccurate but it is a self promotion with deceptive information and not a real biography of facts. Shouldn't you also be a responsible admin and check into what I have brought to your attention? I appreciate your attention into this matter. I have no problem with being blocked from editing and email. I only have a problem with the dishonesty that is allowed on this particular wiki.