User talk:Khanate General/Archives/2014/April

FA congratulations
Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Battle of Caishi to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it at the requests page; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,311 articles in Category:Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. BencherliteTalk 07:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toluid Civil War
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toluid Civil War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dthomsen8 -- 22:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Toluid Civil War
What happened to the GA nomination of the Toluid Civil War? --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Toluid Civil War
Hello! Your submission of Toluid Civil War at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey there. I just wanted to let you know that your DYK is still being held up because it needs a QPQ. If you're looking for a quick and easy one to do, Template:Did you know nominations/UEFA Nations League should present no problems. Just make sure that you address all of the points in the checklist when you do the QPQ.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Toluid Civil War
slakr \ talk / 01:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=605947583 your edit] to Yuan dynasty may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * claimed the Mandate of Heaven and declared that 1272 was the first year of the Great Yuan  in the style of a traditional Chinese dynasty. The name
 * "primal force". Kublai proclaimed Khanbaliq the "Great Capital" or Daidu Dadu ( in Chinese) of the dynasty. The era name was

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yuan dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Canal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:History of China

 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AHistory_of_China&diff=605903182&oldid=603681394
 * (rv Sardanaphalus, major formatting changes to the template should be discussed first on the talk page)


 * WP:BRD.

What you not like about the update? Sardanaphalus (talk) 16:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The update removed the visualization of concurrent dynasties in the timeline and introduced several factual errors. The Jin dynasty was not part of the Southern Song dynasty and the Western Xia dynasty was not part of the Northern Song dynasty. But let's move this discussion to the template talk page.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 16:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The template has since been reverted, with this rationale on the talkpage, to the collapsible version. So, I've just added this response on the talkpage. Sardanaphalus (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)