User talk:Kharari

Welcome!
Hello, Kharari, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 08:59, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

As you are changing sourced text with no justification, I'm not confident with your edits
Please use the article talk page now to explain your edits. Doug Weller talk 08:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 08:59, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nanda Empire, you may be blocked from editing. Akrasia25 (talk) 02:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Dedhiya moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dedhiya, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Chavda dynasty
Hello, Kharari,

You have created this AfD but without providing any reason why this article should be deleted. Please do so or this request to consider the deletion of Chavda dynasty will be closed. Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

GA review
Kharari, are you familiar with the Good Article review process?-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 12:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject assessments
Hi Kharari, thanks for joining the WikiProject India assessment team. I am not sure how long you have been doing assessments, but I notice that the assessment you have added here is wholly improper. Not only have you ignored the existing assessment for the article, but you have added a new assessment that is markedly different from the previous one in importance. If you want to change the ratings like that, you need to initiate a discussion on them talk page, and obtain WP:CONSENSUS.

I am also not confident that you have read through the guidelines given on the assessment page. If not, please do that now before you do any more assessments. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC) And I changed or insert other template of importance just because they are too old rating template — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharari (talk • contribs)
 * I read it more than 10 time's

June 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Thapar (surname). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch &#124; talk 14:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, please note that Competence is required for editing Wikipedia, and your recent edits show a lack of it:
 * Improper assessment, including adding duplicate tags, misplacing assessment categories, falsely claiming an article to be a Featured one, and using assessment as a tool to promote your caste
 * Proposing deletion without providing any reason at all:, and coming up with an invalid rationale when asked for one
 * Incomprehensible English: . Your claim that the articles Chaulukya dynasty and Chavda dynasty have "same information" makes me seriously doubt your command over the language.
 * Unsourced changes:
 * Improper GA reviews


 * If you intend to continue editing Wikipedia, please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines before making edits (e.g. read Reviewing good articles before participating in a GA nomination). Also, if you're more comfortable with your native language, please contribute to Wikipedia in that language, such as Gujarati Wikipedia or Hindi Wikipedia. utcursch &#124; talk 15:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Which caste I promoted? And which tag is duplicate ? In fact your promoting  your caste and playing with ancestral records you think you're over smart know one can understand what you are doing chaulukiya dynasty chavda dynasty.

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 16:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * What is this what u mean by pakistan, afganistan?
 * Don't trying to over smart if do this next time I stop or banned Wikipedia from India understand. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharari (talk • contribs)
 * That is a statutory notice to inform you that discretionary sanctions are in effect for the areas you are editing ("India" in this case). You can ignore Pakistan and Afghanistan part if they don't concern you.
 * Once you have been informed that discretionary sanctions are in effect, any administrator can issue sanctions to you if they find it appropriate. So you need to make sure that you follow all the applicable policies. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Once you have been informed that discretionary sanctions are in effect, any administrator can issue sanctions to you if they find it appropriate. So you need to make sure that you follow all the applicable policies. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Next time before adding any template make sure that is proper for that topic or not and then write any thing.