User talk:Khardy1992/sandbox

Peer Review By Julia Oster
You did a great job contributing to the article and had some really important information to add. You kept a neutral stance on the subject and did not interject your opinion. I think you found very informative and reliable sources and used them well throughout the article. I think that it was a great idea to add the pre-construction section and was full of useful information that contributed to the article overall. The background information enhanced the other ideas that were presented by other editors. Another thing you did very well was the organization of your sandbox. You can really tell that you learned and understood how to use wikipedia. You chose an article that was already packed full with information, especially about the interior, exterior and materials used, some things we really focused on in class. Finding new information to contribute would not have been easy and I think you did really well finding new and fresh facts. I think you included you chose the right spot to input your information and it was an appropriate length in comparison to the rest of the article. Your citations are also done well. A few things that I think could have been done differently include adding a few more sources and background information about Lord Dufferin. I think the sources you had were good, but I think finding a few more sources with different information would have been helpful. When it comes to Lord Dufferin, I was not very sure who he was or what his role was. I think just a little more background information on him would have been beneficial. Finally, I think a little more information in different sections would have helped also. Overall it was a great article! Thank you for your contributions!