User talk:Khattree

Speedy deletion nomination of Binda Prasad Khattri


A tag has been placed on Binda Prasad Khattri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jussychoulex (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC) Hello. Your list of contributions shows a pattern of adding appreciative mentions of Ravindra Khattree to articles.

If Ravindra Khattree is worth mentioning in this way, surely he will have his own article in English-language Wikipedia. As long as he doesn't have one, it's odd to see him listed as an eminent alumnus, etc. I can't say that I've heard of him, but I'm willing to believe that he is eminent, well known, or both. If so, surely somebody will write an article about him: perhaps not so soon, but within the next couple of years (and because this is not a newspaper but an encyclopedia, there is no rush).

I can't help but notice a resemblance between your username and the name Ravindra Khattree. Perhaps you are related, perhaps not. But to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, you should leave the writing of an article about Khattree to some other person. -- Hoary (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Whpq (talk) 11:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Namak haraam ki dyodhi


The article Namak haraam ki dyodhi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The only search results I get are to Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Spaceman  Spiff  20:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharatiya Temple


A tag has been placed on Bharatiya Temple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  02:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)