User talk:Khmer15

April 2015
Thank you for your comments. Please note that, on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of the arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. If your comments concerned a deletion discussion, please consider reading Wikipedia's deletion policy for a brief overview of the deletion process. We hope that you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

{unblock| At this stage your position to assume that I am biased is not more or less valid than my position ensuring you that I am not. The only difference is that I have revealed my identity and that therefore I am ready to take any required step to prove my goodwill and the truth of my words, in compliance with Wikipedia rules. Whether participation is a right or a privilege is not the issue. The issue is whether I have broken a Wikipedia rule. Wikipedia's policies do allow new users to participate in discussions. Wikipedia in fact needs new users to replenish and expand it ranks. I for instance look forward to contributing to Wikipedia on matters related to Cambodia. I also ask the following question: Why do you keep bringing up "technical match with your alleged friend?" I would like to defend myself against this allegation but it is impossible unless I know what the conclusion was based on. I request the administration to provide me with that information. Khmer15 (talk) 02:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)}}