User talk:Khondoker Jobair

Ways to improve Baş Kadın
Hello, Khondoker Jobair,

Thanks for creating Baş Kadın! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chomchom without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You removed the sourced content "who was a native of Ballia district in Uttar Pradesh, India". utcursch &#124; talk 02:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

[[Alu Bhorta] moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Alu Bhorta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 11:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

You've got Talkback!
Hitro talk 15:00, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mahidevran, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you wish to be unblocked, please submit a request from your primary account.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * O Still Small, Will it work? If I don't make any edit (even not anonymously) for six months and then I appeal for unblock, will I be unblocked?Yamaguchi先生, Yamla Is it actual?


 * You would have to make another appeal at the end, then it would be up to the reviewing admin and the blocking admin. But a clean sheet of six months should help. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 09:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * O Still Small, Ok, I'll resist myself for 6 months. Hope this will convince them to understand.Khondoker Jobair (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

This has been sitting in the queue for a while, so may as well move it along to pass/fail:
 * Khondoker Jobair, for this appeal to succeed you need to explain why the actual reason for your block won't happen again. This is not just sockpuppetry, it's the original disruptive editing. Please be aware there needs to be more than just a vague assurance - that would be unconvincing given your past conduct. What do you understand about Wikipedia editing policies that you didn't understand then? What specifically would you want to edit if you were unblocked? Have to say am tending toward declining the appeal because experience has shown that disruptive sockmasters rarely reform. But hope springs eternal.
 * Yamaguchi先生, pinged you as the blocking admin in case you have any views.
 * randomly selected you from the checkuser list, as this is a CU-block but the original CU is no longer in place. Hope that's okay and please do flick this to anyone else for review if preferred. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , from a technical perspective, I do not see any socks here. You may unblock at your discretion if you think it's appropriate. GeneralNotability (talk) 03:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Khondoker Jobair, over to you to comment on dot point 1 above. -- Euryalus (talk) 21:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)