User talk:Khukri/archive2

Erekat
hi, i'm fairly new here, but i put a lot of effort into the few edits i've made... i made sure to place a good measure of fact double crossing and links so that the input i introduce is within' the highest of standarts

all the input i added to the topic Saeb Erekat was removed by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rama .. i do not know the protocols very well, and havn't yet figured out the reverting system or the complaints system.. she categorically removed each part of the article i added.. and if you look it up it had a lot of backing and is very important to the character of the person.

without it, he's portraied as a succesfull and articulate peace negotiator... which does not cover the extent of his background.

i may find how to revert this and do it.. but i do not know how to warn people not to erase things for no reason.. i hope to get a reply from you soon.

Jaakobou 16:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Have left a message with Rama And hope we can start a discussion on this issue, on the Talk Page soon. Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 20:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I gave a pretty long ass reply on the Saeb Erekat talk page .. not sure i explained myself 100% but i'd appreciate your input there also.

Leet vandalism?
I was told that the addition i put to Leet was vandalism and that it was nonesense....its not nonesense. I've been playing MMORPG's since they were first created and I know what i'm talking about. I know the difference between Noob and Newbie (I added in the difference but it was considered nonesense) noob being offensive and newbie being state of fact. Also the smaller differences such as newb (little more offensive then newbie) and n00b(whoeve spells it that way generally is considered arrogant). So what did i do wrong? can you please specify so that I may not make such an error again?

76.3.5.181 01:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your message, and I have reverted your warning. I only saw your last edit to the the article and saw the statement "It is known as a very incompetent and pathetic cowardly thing to do." which is inflammatory and WP:NPOV. Occasionally mistakes do occur whilst sifting through the many vandalisms that occur on wikipedia. But looking at your previous edits, I see that this was in context albeit contentiously worded. Please accept my apologise and feel free to re-add your edit (but maybe change the wording slightly). If you wish I can find your edit and copy it to your user page. Also if you wish to continue editing Wikipedia may I suggest you get an account, easily done, and this can help to avoid issues like this in the future. Any problems don't hesitiate to give me a shout. Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 08:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Why do you want the disscussion at User talk:Khukri/old1 deleted
Please respond back at my talk page, thanks! —— Eagle (ask me for help) 12:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey no problem. I just happened to see your request in WP:CSD. I will delete it after this post. (I always do user requests first, signified by User: (in the category). Cheers!!! —— Eagle (ask me for help) 13:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * P.S. the category is CAT:CSD—— Eagle (ask me for help) 13:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Please don't, I just preformed a history merge, so that all of your prior edits to the other page are kept. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 13:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, no problem buddy. :) —— Eagle (ask me for help) 13:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:67.72.98.87
I wanted to restore it, but you beat me to it, so I reverted your edit. Sorry. -- Chodorkovskiy  (talk)  18:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks! I'm glad you already have one. Saves the awkwardness. -- Chodorkovskiy  (talk)  19:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * He gave me one too :D woohoo Lordkazan 19:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Help me!
the admin that blocked 67.72.98.87 is about to block me for 3RR when I was removing that users vandalism of the article! I don't think he's paying attention to what is going on - (in b4 teh ban!) Lordkazan 19:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Eric Robert Rudolph
Hi Netsnipe, I'm just letting you know I think there may have been an injustice done with the the block applied to the above user. Admitedly I haven't checked all his edits in detail, but the last couple of hours, himself and 4 other editors (myself included) have been reverting alot of vandalism and WP:NPOV edits by User_talk:67.72.98.87 who is now blocked. Could you please revisit this decision or if it for reasons that I am not aware, please accept my apologise. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 19:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I didn't block Lordkazan, but I did block TripleH1976 for WP:3RR. The block notice on Lordkazan's page was a mistake and I've removed it. But anyway, I've asked another admin to review TripleH1976's block. --  Netsnipe  ►  19:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Ted Kaczynski
Ted Kaczynski killed more than three people in seperate attacks that makes him a serial killer. 132.241.246.111 21:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Irrelevant, what he did is explained adequetly in the article, changing american to serial killer is vandalism and the warning stands. You are a serial vandaliser any continuation this evening and you will be blocked. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 21:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Irrelevant, His being an American is explained adequetly in the article, changing serial killer to american is vandalism and this warning stands. You are a serial vandaliser any continuation this evening and you will be blocked.  132.241.246.111 21:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Very childish Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 21:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Gannon advertised himself as "a $200-an-hour gay prostitute" it's in the article so how about you revert your vandalism? 132.241.246.111 21:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. Gamaliel 21:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Jeff Gannon
Please do not describe content disputes as vandalism and do not issue vandalism warnings to those you are in a content dispute with. Thank you. Gamaliel 21:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Norwich City F.C.
I recently edited Norwich City fc's page. I added to the nicknames secion "scummers and City. Both of these nicknames are true. Norwich are often refurred to as the "Scummers" by local rivals "Ipswich Town FC" You deleted the nicknames I added and I was just wondering why a I beleive them to be true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.164.85 (talk • contribs)


 * If you look around (google it) alot local rivalries call the other team scummers and I'm 90% sure you'll find it came from Southhampton for Portsmouth. Also it isn't a nickname like the canaries or gunners etc, it's an insult, hence the reason I removed it. By all means add city but that's only a local nickname for norwich i.e. City n Town. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 15:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Why?
Why can't I delete information from my own page? And why not edit your spelling a bit better? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.90.172 (talk • contribs)


 * Hi, it's not your page, as well as being the talk page it's a record of 'our' conduct on wikipedia. As for criticising my spelling I suggest you google John Hill's Law.Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 15:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

66.138.150.228
Thanks for reporting this IP to WP:AIV, I actually was doing it at the same time and we had an edit conflict over it. Anyways, thanks I was getting tired of reverting him all by myself! -- DrunkenSmurf


 * Always a pleasure, never a chore. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 19:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Help! more vandalism
Release the hounds! Dasondas is vandalizing Circumcision see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&curid=6783&diff=74594757&oldid=74594205 - i have reverted 3 times and want to play it on the safe side Lordkazan 21:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Whoa easy tiger. Good job you stepped back from the brink there. Have a look at his first change whilst stating the word law may be controversial, it isn't untrue. Next the phrase he removed starts with the classic weasel words many people which in that he is correct, unless fact can be cited then it is Original Research. IMHO I would leave it, if it's your article then I would read through WP:DR and if you aren't happy after that then go for the nuclear option with WP:RFAR. But two points warning him with vandalism will not get you anywhere. I had my wrist slapped for a similar thing few days back and in hindsight it's correct. It's not vandalism when you think about it. Something to you might seem obviously wrong, but that is no justification to change it.  I know it's sometimes difficult but try to remember WP:GF. Second point, never revert to caps lock in a dispute, it's the metaphorical equivalent of throwing teddy out of the cot and then following it with the cot. I know it's not what you wanted to hear, but breath deeply and chill. If it stays there for a day or so while you get it resolved it's not a problem is it? Anyway take it easy and don't hesitate to give me a shout for another installment of stories with uncle Khukri. Cheers Khukri  ( talk  .  contribs ) 21:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah i reported him to incidents lemme copy+paste my content from there, even if those things qualify under what you listed - that's not why he's removing them Lordkazan 21:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Dasondas POV-pushing edits/personal attacks

in Circumcision and Genital modification and mutilation - personal attacks at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALordkazan&diff=74547340&oldid=74186332 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGenital_modification_and_mutilation&diff=74453398&oldid=74451415

I haven't reverted his latest vandalism because It could be seen as a content dispute. I consider it vandalism because he's blanking information and altering it in full knowledge that he is violating NPOV rules and has blasted anyone who disagrees with him as "a bigot" or a "symapthizer of a fringe group" or "ignorant of the religious significance" (even though I - who am an antireligious atheist have told him that I am in no way opposed to him volunarily getting himself circed and asked the rhetorical question that "would not voluntary circumcision when one is old enough to consent not be more religiously meaningful?") - i'm tired of his POV-pushing and his personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with him Lordkazan 21:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Chill, There are 6 billion people out there and I most probably wouldn't agree with 99.99% percent of them on many things. But my POV is irrelevant here. Look up in my talk for a problem brought to my attention about the Saeb Erekat article and look at their talks. I have an opinion on it, but I'm not going to say what it is as it's irrelevant to the article. This is one appraoch you can take to resolving this, and if it doesn't get resolved state your case clearly with to the arbitration mob. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 22:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Arrested Development
Arrested Development - Episode: Storming the Castle This is a running joke in the series, not something made up. Please revert back to my additions. I am currently watching the series and adding more as I go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.199.27.204 (talk • contribs)


 * OK I'll have to take your word for it. But I have to say everytime I've seen something like GOB is cheating on his girlfriend Marta with the women who is the 'legs' of his saw the lady in half trick. it's been bona fide vandalism. So my mistake I've scrubbed your warning, and reverted the page. But please revisit it to make sure it reads correctly, also my apologies(ish). Cheers and sorry.Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 22:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

It's not vandalism, and it does read correctly. Thanks for working to keep Wikipedia clean : )

Music spammer
Right you are, no more warnings from me. Regards, Mr Stephen 23:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Rashid Khalidi
Hi Khukri,

I see you gave an anonymous user a vandalism warning for removing a large amount of material from the page on Rashid Khalidi. I appreciate that it may be hard to tell if you are not familiar with the area, but the material in question was in fact highly tendentious and biassed, and removing it was perfectly in line with Wikipedia policy in general and policy on biographies of living people in particular. In fact it had also been vigorously contested on the talk page. Just to let you know. Cheers, Palmiro | Talk 18:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * As you say it's difficult to tell when 50 lines of article disappear without any edit commentary. If the editor wishes to discuss/remove his warning I have no problems at all to discuss the matter.. Have left a message with 12.10.123.20 to discuss. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 19:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Khukri, I appreciate it. Palmiro | Talk 10:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

DOnt you just love dennis? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.87.54.3 (talk • contribs)

Excuse me?
I don't know how you operate in Canada, but in my country, that's sexual harassment. I'd like a full apology - my daughter reads this myspace stuff too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.58.102 (talk • contribs)


 * Erm.... your Sherlock Holmes radar needs calibrating. You're talking to a Scot in Switzerland, zero to do with Canada. Why the apology? You tried to remove a warning from your talk pages without any commentary? If you feel aggrieved by the warning take it up with the issuer, and they will remove it, if deemed fit. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 21:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Do not change message on my talk pages for myspace it is considered spam. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs )

Re: Evening
I know it's a real ball ache for you, but would you mind leaving a message on the talk page of those you've blocked please, that they're blocked. Not having your godlike powers makes, it's a pain in the proverbial when I'm looking at who I've given warnings to over the last couple of hours or soto see if they've carried on etc. Cheers muchly Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 22:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I thought that I always told people/IP addresses that I have blocked a) that I have done so and b) the duration of the block. Can you provide a link to one that I haven't please? Your message comes across as sarcastic, by the way, but I won't intepret it as such.  (aeropa gitica)  22:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry didn't mean it to come across as sarky in the slightest. There's too few people looking out for vandalism IMHO, and I don't mean to insult in any way at all. My message just came about from 8.8.36.69 someone I'd been watching for a bit, and I saw you blocked him/her with a couple of others thats all. Don't take it in the wrong way at all, never meant as a criticism, it just helps those few of us non admins who do the occasional edits and patrol work. Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 22:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, be careful about using humour via e-mail/Talk pages because it is not always taken in the spirit in which it was meant by your readers! If you look at Special:Blockip/8.8.36.69, you will see that the IP address was blocked by Ahoerstemeier rather than myself. Can you direct your comments towards them, please?  Perhaps I cleaned up WP:AIV when all of the IP addresses had been blocked and you picked my name from that instead. Goodnight!  (aeropa gitica)  22:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Your warning
The warning you left seemed as if you thought Chacor was the issuer of the userpage vandalism warning. However he was notififying me about WP:NOT, not vandalism on a userpage. So it seems as if you somehow became confused? Anyways... -24.92.41.95 22:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Not at all I was just removing the fact you left the message cuntbag on the user page of Chacor. If you continue you will receive more warnings. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 22:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Brits
Dude, British people suck. Too bad we pwned you in the Revolutionary War. So sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.31.114.157 (talk • contribs)

Conflict
Hi, I need your help! User AIUI continuously reverts the article Operation Atilla. The last time, while i was adding a reference from BBC online, a conflict occured and this conflict prevented my connection. I realised a minute later that i was somehow logged out (p/s: i tried to edit later and in the history page of the article i saw ip instead of my user name). Is it possible to prevent this user's editing this article? (this user is a suspected sock puppet or impersonator of User:YaR GnitS) cause he is reverting without reading my version and his version contains a historical mistake that can be realised from BBC online here[]. I shall greatly appreciate if you inform me about the procedure should be followed. Thanx. E104421 15:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, the problem is over now. This user gave up reverting but i still do not know why i was logged out. I just wonder my log in failure. E104421 21:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: 2 Warnings question
I was hoping nobody'd notice that, heh. The block notice is. Another admin mentioned it to me on IRC, once; I plan to avoid using it when possible, since in some ways calling vandals and trolls names only enourages them. Just some cases are a bit... exasperating. I know it's a bit of a drag to have to do a full test1 through 4 set; I tend to give people two or three warnings if they're textbook vandals, or sometimes just one if they're obviously experienced at it. Vandalism and username blocks vary from admin to admin; different people will block over different things, although there's a pretty general consensus to avoid blocking if we can help it (preventive, not punitive, after all). Or something. Kinda rambling. See you around. :) Luna Santin 21:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Your AIV report
I saw you reporting MER-C in WP:AIV, are you sure it's him or you were trying to report someone else? --WinHunter (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * My bad! looks like he was reverting Vandalism to Richard Hammond by 195.195.24.252 at the same time I was and got caught in the cross fire when I clicked the button. My mistake and thanks for picking it up. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 13:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Sock acivity
Vandal - it's connected to an AFD - this one. --Charlesknight 22:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for fixing the typo on my user page! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 21:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Oops, wrong user! Thanks for reverting the vandalism... EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 21:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * No problems, I'd have reported him to WP:AIV but vandalproof went belly up at exactly the wrong moment. But I see he's been reported now. All the best Khukri (talk . contribs) 21:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Always the way...thanks again,

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 21:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: warning about Nitrification
If you take a look at the diff you specified, you'll notice I was removing vandalism, not adding it. Regards, Nick—Contact/Contribs 23:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks for your prompt reply. Regards, Nick—Contact/Contribs 23:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
How is editing your own pages considered reason for blocking....it didn't say anything under the rules of blocking72.20.207.29 20:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Your mistake was thinking it is your page. You deleted warning on your page you got warned for it, end of story. The talk page as well as a method of talking to other editors is a record of our conduct whilst using wikipedia. That is the reason you will see alot of us archive everything. regards Khukri  ( talk  .  contribs ) 20:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Enjoys Butter
It's not vandalism, I was editing from work, not logging in. For some reason my userboxes are shifting positions, so that's all the activity. Had a few friends making changes to the page as well. Thanks for your concern. EnjoysButter 22:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Stop
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to user:24.31.114.157, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- 24.31.114.57 (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Given by vandal 24.31.114.157 for warnings I've issued and having left WP:ATTACK on his/her page, hence irrelevant, another warning issued. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 22:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, not irrelevant. Check the talk page of that user, and you will see that this Kukhri person has deleted a comment posted on the talk page numerous times, just because it talked about him unfavorably. Thus, she should probably be removed from editing status. --24.31.114.157 22:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to respectfully ask you to stop editing other people's pages. It only makes you look bad, and it makes you look like you have no life. If you have a life, I am sorry for my mistake, but it looks like you have none. Anyway, please stop making unneccessary edits to others' pages, just because they say something unfavorable about you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.31.114.157 (talk • contribs)

WP:AIV
Sorry about that. It was unintentional, collateral damage from trying to report the vandal who was blanking your warnings. I am seeing a lot of collisions and splatter from using the tool VandalProof, and am thinking about dropping its use, at least until it is improved. I don't think I'm using it wrong, but....
 * --Ziusudra 16:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Arnav Tripathy
Greetings, recently you voted in an AfD discussion on the article Arnav Tripathy. After you voted, much discussion has gone on. I encourage you to research the issue, read the varying opinions, note that Triapthy did not create or edit the article, and consider changing your vote. Thank you very much. --Mysmartmouth 02:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry my opinion hasn't changed. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 07:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Message you left me
Thank you for experimenting with the page Hostel on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 20:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I have never been to the page hostel, so I don't know what you mean


 * Well someone using your IP address has, see here maybe this is a proxy IP. I suggest you get a login to avoid this type of message. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 09:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fighting off those vandals on my user page, much apreshiated.--Fabio 10:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Edit conflicts during vandal fighting
Although sometimes it's frustrating, it always makes me a bit happy to know so many editors are on the case! We edit conflicted again reporting the same IP vandal to WP:AIV. You're so fast...Thanks for all your hard work. Dina 15:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the User Page revert
Thanks for the vandalism revert.--mordicai. 21:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Thus Spake Ziusudra
Hi, Khukri. No, I don't mind at all your improving the warning I applied to the vandal of User:Jossi. In fact I'd be grateful. As I am relatively new to VandalProof, I don't always remember the exact text associated with the buttons. For some of the warnings, I have yet to discover the documentation at all (e.g. the "blanking" rollbacks). It would be really helpful if the buttons had flyover help balloons. Maybe VP2 will have something like that.


 * Thanks, --Ziusudra 22:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

User:198.237.47.196
Please note that this user blanked United States House elections, 2006, after your warning to the user's talk page. I have reverted it. Please consider blocking the user. Thesmothete 21:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Reported to WP:AIV, Cheers for the info. Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 21:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorryyyyy
Sorry for "vandalising" the pages but I was extremely bored. And Morrisey might like unicycles! You never know!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.3.95 (talk • contribs)

democratic vandalism
Dear Khukri, I need your advice, cause i do not want to involve in any edit war but there is on going war against every turks/turkey related articles by users tekleni and hectorian. Actually, i'm trying not to take them into account but i'm confronting with these users almost all the turks/turkey related articles. I'll give you a recent example. The article Turkish Republic of Western Thrace is merged with the article Republic of Gumuljina by user tekleni (who is supported by user hectorian) without building any consensus on the talk/discussion page (even without any note, so quickly). These greek nationalists (can be realized from their contributions history) are now trying to delete the article. If you investigate their contributions history, you'll immediately discover that these users are trying to dispute everything related with turks/turkey related subjects. Wikipedia should not be a propaganda or advertisement service for turkish hostility. What should we do? E104421 06:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I don't have the time to look through all their contributions, but I have to say looking quickly at the talk pages I don't see alot of contention. I'm not an expert on the subject so bear with me pleae. Give me examples of where your problems are, I'll have a look into it. I also can't see any discussion from you on the subject or much interaction. Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 09:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, there was a edit war on that article, and i decided not to involved in, but just wrote my observations to you. I also commented the same to Alex. He involved in the issue, merged the articles and histories of the articles and removed the nomination for deletion. The issue, i hope, is over for this article. However, i often see the names of the same people who attack turks/turkish related articles in an organized way. Actually, i hate edit wars, but i also want to prevent these kind of edit wars. What should i do? Should i check their edit histories all the time? E104421 10:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

User:Khukri/templates
FYI: User:Khukri/templates is currently showing up in Category:Requests for unblock. --  Netsnipe  ►  16:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Cheers for that, I'm trying to create a page to reduce the size of WP:UTM using templates to reflect what is shown on WP:TT. Looking through alot of the templates there are inconsistancies. I re-worked a couple, but soon realised that without a comprehensive page, it would never be harmonised. But 1 page is just too big for it all hence my grand plan ;). Just thought I'd explain in case you thought I was up to any ol' mischief. Anyway how can I get round that warning or should I just nowiki it until I'm prepared to unveil it or it goes live? Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 16:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Have you tried using &lt;noinclude&gt;? --  Netsnipe  ►  16:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

compromise
Hi, Khukri. Everything related with the dispute i mentioned above is progressing in a wonderfull way. The user Fut.Perf. is involved in the issue to compromise. We started to discuss the issue on the talk/discussion page of Fut.Perf.. I hope we'll solve the dispute and put an end to unfortunate edit wars. Kind regards, E104421 18:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Rubbish
What i put was not nonsense, surely it wasnt that hard to understand

ps, the other guy who said sorry is correct. Im a close personal friend of morrisey and he likes unicycles a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.158.30 (talk • contribs)

Invest Sign on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Invest Sign. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.219.150.193 (talk • contribs)

Re: Gakhar page reverts
Thankyou so much for being vigilant and taking away things that are not supposed to be written, seems like anyone will create stuff or would love to add their names to the sites not realizing that what effect it would have, (confusion), so once again thankx a zillion for being there watching out of retards and their comments.

Godspeed

Mobeen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobeen.raja (talk • contribs)

Thanks re AfD on Andy Stephenson
Hi. Thanks for your message, and for doing all that work on the AfD puppetry. I like the grounds you gave for your vote, too. Cheers, CWC (talk) 12:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Unfortuntely, IMHO though it's a very poor reason for not having an article in an encyclopedia. There is a chance that he could meet WP:BIO, but two of the three tenants of are 1 Verifiability & Neutral point of view, which I believe this article will never meet. Also the vote loading is just an indication of who ever tries to take it on will be in a struggle. I'll keep an eye on it till it's concluded. Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 12:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikify SPA
Done. No problem. Thanks for the heads-up.--Rosicrucian 18:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Warning templates
I'd be happy to help where I can - I am being careful about making additional commitments right now; however, because I am not sure how my time schedule will go. I've added Khukri/templates to my watchlist :) -- Trödel 20:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at Recently_created_admins. Warmly,  Durova  21:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

u send the wrong message to the wrong person
ive never read dodo article. u mustve sent it to the wrong person —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.6.119 (talk • contribs)


 * Well someone from this IP did see here IP:124.184.6.119. May I suggest you get an account to avoid this type of problem again in the future. Regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 10:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)