User talk:Khun krabi4

Tomoi
Usually I'd resolve these conflicts on the article's discussion page, but in this case I thought it would be more appropriate to bring this directly to your talk page. First of all, you are removing a referenced sentence from the history section. Second, you are removing notable (albeit unreferenced) material without explanation. Third, I'm not sure if that one source of yours stands up to WP:Reliable, not to mention you're not placing it correctly. And finally, even if your citation was reliable, the material you persistently add is not even relevant. Tomoi is not unique to Kedah nor is there any evidence that it spread from there. In fact, it's generally believed to have spread from Kelantan. The number of Thai temples or Kedah's dominant religion have nothing to do with tomoi. Seeing as your edits are entirely unconstructive, I'll undo them once again. Before making any further changes, let's discuss it first without turning this into an edit war. Morinae (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tomoi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 19:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)