User talk:Ki4bu

December 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pornography in Canada, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 06:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

And what do you mean the Science section was "too weak"? theinstantmatrix (talk) 06:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pornography in Canada, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 06:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

This is why
Well there is only one line. Even i know there is a lot more to it. The introduction is barely talking about the legal site and there is a lot more to it i also think that the reader should know more about both the science and history of pornography. The entire page show no information what so ever on the matter. Ki4bu (talk) 06:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)