User talk:Kibria haider

Welcome!
Hello, Kibria haider, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Freemesm (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

March 2013
Hello, I'm Darkness Shines. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Ghulam Azam, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ghulam Azam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jschnur (talk) 13:32, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ghulam Azam with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Arctic  Kangaroo  13:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Ghulam Azam. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:46, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Ghulam Azam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edit-warring has been noted; this is the final warning for continued BLP violations. Drmies (talk) 17:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)