User talk:Kick2002

Image tagging for Image:Eva Henger.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eva Henger.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Eva_Henger1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Eva_Henger1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Eva_Henger.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Eva_Henger.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Blue Angel (pornstar)
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Blue Angel (pornstar), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Virginie Caprice.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Virginie Caprice.jpg, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 23:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Alektra Blue
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Also please note that MySpace is not considered a reliable source, especially for something like orientation. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alex Arden
I have nominated Alex Arden, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Alex Arden. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Doug Weller (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Anita Blond
I've reverted your edits to the Anita Blond article. Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy before editing the article again. Dismas |(talk) 15:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Alex Arden
I have nominated Alex Arden, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Alex Arden&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Epbr123 (talk) 07:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Justene Jaro


The article Justene Jaro has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 08:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cali Taylor


The article Cali Taylor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epbr123 (talk) 08:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Malena Morgan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malena Morgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malena Morgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Brett Rossi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brett Rossi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brett Rossi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Whitney Westgate


The article Whitney Westgate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Brett Rossi


Hello, Kick2002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brett Rossi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)