User talk:Kicksource

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lunarlon. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 22:36, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with YEEZY Wave Runner 700. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 22:40, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

SOL3 (Insole)
Per the instructions on SOL3 (Insole), please do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. Or I will just have to reinstate it again. Edwardx (talk) 23:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Lunarlon, you may be blocked from editing. Stop doing this. You ar enot allowed to remove the AFD notice. Doing so becsuae you are in a snit and don't want you contributions in Wikipedia is pointless (the article will likely be deleted) and will just get you blocked. Meters (talk) 03:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Why would you delete my content and write all of this nonsense on my page then? I've provided legitimate edits and articles. I don't even know what you guys were accusing me of doing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kicksource (talk • contribs)
 * Go to the linked AFDs and see why they are up for deletion. The only one I have looked at says that the article does not demonstrate the notability of the subject. That's not an accusation against you, it's simply a judgement of the notability of the article topic. You need to find reliable independent sources to show that the particular shoe model is notable. The mere fact that it exists does not make it notable. Read WP:N and WP:RS. Meters (talk) 03:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Nike HyperAdapt 1.0 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nike HyperAdapt 1.0 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nike HyperAdapt 1.0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)