User talk:Kierano/Archive 1

Hi Kierano, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:


 * Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
 * The help centre and FAQs
 * The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. (Just so you know, some people won't pay attention to unsigned comments).

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

Above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

– T.P.K. 15:49, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Welcome Kierano,

Good to have someone from KZN. Why don't you add your name at Wikipedians/South Africa. See you around.--Jcw69 06:28, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Wyrd
Hi, I noticed that you edited the article on Wyrd. I just wanted to let you know that I did a major over-haul on the page, and that you might want to have a look at it in order to continue its improvement.

Yogensha 23:10, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

GRider
Regarding GRider's 'Socratic' VfD nominations and the ensuing reactions by voters, please read and comment on Requests for comment/GRider2. Thanks. Radiant_* 10:29, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * However, please note that 'notability' is used very often on VfD as a reason for nominating or voting, so that cannot really be held against GRider. I believe it is a de facto criterion even if it's not strictly written in policy (and if I were to put on my lawyer hat, I could make a reasonable case for it by quoting policy). Radiant_* 11:42, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * I've taken your remarks under the header of 'users certifying the basis of the dispute' and moved them to the 'discussion' section. Am I correct to interpret that this does indeed mean that you certify the basis of the dispute? If not please edit the RfC page accordingly. Radiant_* 12:14, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You take it correctly. If anything, my views are somewhat more extreme (I'll strive for NPOV): The whole issue of notability is new to me: In fact, the whole Vote for Deletion process is something I only discovered when GRider nominated a page I was working on (and in a way which, to me, smacked of discrimination against people practicing body modification). However, as I have mentioned, that is not the subject of the RfC. I do agree with your reasons for posting it. I'm still looking for the best way to express them myself. However, count me in in acknowledging that there is a problem with GRider's behaviour.

Arbitration Committee case opening
The Arbitration Committee has accepted the case against GRider. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/GRider/Evidence]]. Thank you. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 19:40, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)

Arbitration case - final decision
A decision has been reached in the arbitration case you requested. User:GRider is prohibited from editing any deletion-related page for a period of one year. Please see Requests for arbitration/GRider for further details and the full decision. -- sannse (talk) 19:00, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Zulu
Thanks for your recent additions at Zulu. Just one remark: it's perfectly OK (in fact, it's desirable) for the lead section to effectively provide a summary of major points of the article. I'm not going to mess with this; I would restore the old lead, but it looks like some of your removals might be corrections. Anyway, you might want to follow up on this. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:03, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Nice work on this page. Wizzy&hellip; &#9742;   13:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)



Khoisan lang navbox
Thank you very much. I like making navboxes. I never got around to finishing adding the box to all of the Khoisan languages. Thanks again, -- M e r o v i n g i a n  (t) (c) 18:12, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

Maritzburg!
Hey there, I'm just happy to see someone from PMB. I studied at UKZN from August to December 2004, and loved every minute of it. Thought I'd just say cheers. =) Elefuntboy 7 July 2005 19:00 (UTC)

Science timelines reordering
Thanks much for taking on that job. I had reordered several other categories and had reached the limit of how much of that I wanted to do with that one. Hence the note instead of the work. --EMS | Talk 14:39, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Ethnic groups
I've been bashing WikiProject_Ethnic_groups into a semblance of current. Could I prevail on you to update the groups you've worked on or plan to work on? Thanks. -- Jmabel | Talk 11:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi there!
I just wanted to say that you've done a great job on PMB and the ethnic groups in SA. Very nice. Elefuntboy 08:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject South African municipalities
Hi! I see you've been making a lot of edits relating to South African municipalities. I have just started WikiProject South African municipalities, and I was wondering if you would like to join and contribute? - htonl 19:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Funny, I was also thinking about a rambot-style census bot for South Africa. I'll see what I can find out about getting hold of programmatically-usable data. As to the map scripts, I'll put them up here as soon as I can, but they need a bit of cleaning up - they're a bit, uhh..., anachronistic. ;) Give me a day or two, and I'll have them all up. - htonl 20:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Library of Earth and Sky
After reading all the comments on my talk page, I have decided to scrap the library and instead use simple alphabetised lists ("Animals of the Edge Chronicles" etc). Thank you for your healthy criticism. This being my first venture into Wiki, I kinda guessed I'd make glaringly obvious mistakes, but I intend to learn from them (:

P.S. Please feel free to delete all the library subsections, but could you wait until at least tomorrow to give me time to copy the info. Thanks!--Ninty 09:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject: South African municipalities
Pages - its partially programatic. I have some asp code that generates the wiki markup which I cut and paste. I then edit anything that needs an obvious change. Graphs: cool. Do Share. I didn't know Python until a few minutes ago but am sure I can use it. If not no harm done. The only hassle is loading them up into the commons. Does wiki not have some graph type markup? --Waynedam 21:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Arg I've been lazy on this for a while and haven't really been working with any database stuff for a while. If I can get as much of the data as possible

As far as I understand it we are going to essentially need to look into getting together two databases: 1) containing information on each of the municipalities - basically the info that appears in the info bar. If somebody draws up a bot that can plug the information into the articles or at least just spew the information into a plaintext file that sets it out how the infobox must look then the process of drawing up municipal articles can move along swiftly.

2) the information on the census information, it may be particularly useful to be in a possition to cite an estimated population for specific settlements based on the census division. However I think this particular matter is being looked at by the various compsci geeks of the world and it is far above my league at this point.

Obviously database 1 will get information from database 2.

Thoughts? Paul Hjul 10:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Persian people
Could you take a look at the first sentence in this section? It claims that Persians are descendants of some "Aryan tribes" migrating from Central Asia. Sounds like outdated racial theories to me. The same source (Britannica) says Persians are of mixed ancentry, but when I try to add this in people remove it. I don't think this is consistent with WP:NPOV. Could you take a look at this and leave a comment? Thanks, AucamanTalk 06:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

In response to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_South_African_municipalities it can be done will be more than a minor project in database design (which I know very little about). Im going to need the data though, which I assume is a fairly large chunk and will need to be transported by cd's and post. Give me a shout at my talk page

Please vote
Hi, if you have not yet done so, we could sure use your input on Requests for adminship/Dewet. Thanks! Elf-friend 10:26, 19 May 2006

Alcatel
Yes, (most of) his edits have been a source of concern to me too. I will comply with your suggestion, but the time may come when we will have to take more formal action (Request for Comment, Arbcom, etc.)

Regards, Elf-friend 10:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Job opportunity
Hey Kieran, thanks very much for the job info - it looks very interesting - but unfortunately I already have a job going in this holiday. On the other hand, if there is still work available over the summer vac I would certainly be interested. Cheers, htonl 23:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Volkstaat and Orania articles
Kierano, what WEASEL words did I add in? Please point them out? --Zaphnathpaaneah 14:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi Kierano, I think you did a great job of clarifying the issues I have been having with the editing, and the generalizations. I think I need to discuss this issue of Weasel words with you in the Orania and Volkstaat articles. You gave two examples that I used, however, I fail to see how those examples are actually examples of weaseling. You mention that my responses are reactionary, and perhaps the two examples are of me countering bias, but being unable to articulate around or nullify the previous weaseling tactics. So in effect you see me "out-weaseling" the weasel? I see my comments in,. to be not weasel tactics, but instead clarifications to counter act the weaseling tactics. For example, #4 was posted in order to prevent readers from being misled by the notion that Whites in S.A. lost their rights by the misleading (weaseling) comment in the "Lack of Political Power" section earlier which stated "The Afrikaners, who form a small minority group in South Africa (8% of total population 2001 est.), handed over their political power in South Africa during the 1994 democratic elections. " People will be weaseled into thinking they gave up their rights as they read further with all the implied talk of Afrikaaner rights being compromised. So in effect, what I am getting at is that the reactionary Afrikaaner contributions are very subtly crafted to lull the reader into assuming that in S. Africa the Whites are being unfairly diminished in some way. --Zaphnathpaaneah 02:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

A weasel word is a word that is intended to, or has the effect of, softening the force of a potentially loaded or otherwise controversial statement, or avoids forming a clear position on a particular issue. for me, I am only trying to UNDO that.

I ask for your input out of honest sincerity, because I think you are the first person that I have come across in here who has properly put the issues in perspective. How can I more effectively dissassemble weaseling tactics by reactionaries in topics of race? So I am listening to what you wrote and will try the ideas out. --Zaphnathpaaneah 02:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Just curious, HAVE you also spoke with the agitators on the other side? Like Ron? I mean, i appreciate your input here, but i fear that the "voice of reason" is only "given" to those on one side, while the other side is left believing they are reasonable. Shall Ron and his comments also be given no response from you? --68.60.55.162 17:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

I regards to doing the varied things to counteract right-wing contributions that are unmeritious and without citation... How about instead of all of those things you suggested (which are constructive suggestions), instead lets just remove the statements all together and require that they present facts and citations, just in the same manner my statements (and other non-right wing contributors) are removed for the lack of the same quality. If you can feel compelled to remove left-wing comments, why not right-wing comments? I am constantly edited out and told to refer, but when a right-wing comment is done in the same manner, I am required to respond to it (instead of requiring them to remove it and come back). That's not fair, thats the POV I see prevalaent in Wikipedia, apologies, but that's just what I see. --Zaphnathpaaneah 17:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Kierano, I want you to know I hold you in high respect, and I do not have any gripe. I just want to have "free speech for me" as well as "free speech for theem".--Zaphnathpaaneah 12:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Kierano, thank you for your hard work on the Volkstaat and Orania articles. Your methodology is excellent for the furtherance of an encyclopaedic article, complete with references.  Wikipedia is not a forum for free speech, it is an information tool for unbiased facts.  It would be good to free the articles of "weasel words" and biased POV, in order for Wikipedia's goal to be achieved.  I will try to help as much as I can.  -Gemsbok1 09:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Sending you the SA stats data
I haven't checked the data I got from Stats SA thoroughly – and I can't really, not from here – but I can tell you that it can't be too outdated: Plettenberg Bay appears as Bitou. You asked for the data; I'll be happy to send it. I see I can't e-mail you through Wiki, but please e-mail me and then I'll have your address so I can send you the data.

You can't make it language-agnostic; language names, party names, the neighbours field, the very article title are language-dependent. We'll make it in English with an easy way of converting to other languages. (For instance, I have in my mind the algorithm to convert the twelve language fields to my preferred afrikaans 91%, inglês 5%, xhosa 2%, sesotho 2% format. See? Language-dependent.)

My data has no districts; just metro and local municipalities.

By the way, how interesting that you are from PMB; I thought you were from the Cape. The reason for my interest in South Africa lies right there in Maritzburg - by the banks of the Duzi, to be more precise. -- Tintazul msg 22:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Small world indeed!
It is a small world! A Rocha works with DUCT all right, see the 2005 Annual Review (PDF) or Making the connection in South Africa in the latest international news. I've been working with A Rocha for a few years now (web site), have met the SA nat'l director, and when my logo proposal was accepted I took a particular interest in your country. Which led me the the SA Municipalities project!

If you're in the Cape and enjoy the outdoors (all South Africans do, or so I'm told), you should know that one of the board members of ARSA is Conservation Area Manager for the City of Cape Town, based at Rondevlei. -- Tintazul msg 22:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Demographics
Hi, Finally got around to doing some graphs. Actually used excel - it can save png file (who would have guessed). Before I upload the lot - have a look at Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality. Also got the new stats Sa data aligned to the new boundaries. --Uxejn 21:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Weasel words - Volkstaat article
Kierano, will you please assist in identifying the weasel words for whom you put a tag on the Volkstaat page. We need to work to lift the tag as it impairs the value the article has for users, even though the standard of the article has been raised quite substantially since it's inception. --Gemsbok1 08:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Caught in an autoblock
Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Netsnipe for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Adriaan 1". The reason given for Adriaan 1's block is: "Use of 72.232.98.64 to vandalise userpages.".

Your IP address is 198.54.202.254.


 * Autoblock lifted. Hope it works for you now. Happy editing! ➨  ЯEDVERS  20:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Mhlanga River in Natal
I created the Huberta, the hippopotamus page and I managed to find the Umgeni river but couldn't find the Mhlanga River. Does it have a different name/spelling?--Moonlight Mile 07:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Your vote please
Hi Kierano - Please vote on the proposed title change of the 'South African farmer murders' page. The straw poll is here. Please also pass this message on to others you think would be interested. Thank you! Cheers, Jason Lionchow - Talk 21:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Crime Expo South Africa
Your contributions to the Crime Expo South Africa article will be appreaciated.--222.155.16.224 10:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

South African films
Hi!! Please can you help fill in the List of South African films I am afraid it will be up for afd. I and a few other users are trying to fill the lists by country in. If you can add the details on the films already on wikipedia in year order from Category:SOuth African films and any others you know of from notable directors etc that would be a great help for WP Film sand South Africa!. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦  "Expecting you" "S.P.E.C.T.R.E" 16:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2007
Hi Kierano

Wikimania 2007, which is being held in Taipei, Taiwan on August 3-5, is offering opportunities for travel scholarships to Wikimania for active users of Wikimedia projects from the continent of Africa. Although the original scholarship deadline has passed, please, if you are interested, you may still apply at http://wm07schols.wikimedia.org/apply.php. Sincerely yours, Cary Bass 20:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

*Keels over laughing*
Thanks. The page kinda needed a little humour, I guess. *rolls eyes* -Kieran 15:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it did. In the early stages I kept trying to lighten the mood by lapsing into non-sequiturs such as thanking all participants for helping improve my grasp of English, but that fell by the wayside a long time ago as [ RANT OMITTED ]! Anyway, thanks. --Kizor 15:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Medcab
I sorry, but no. The pro-spoiler side of this debate has gone far too deep into the land of incivility and personal attacks for me to be able to mediate in good faith. My position is simple, and has been explained at sufficient length that I feel no need to articulate it yet again for the benefit of a bunch of people who have, by this point, made it abundantly clear that they prefer edit wars to rational discourse. Phil Sandifer 20:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, I see you have been a Wikipedian for about twice as long as I have, but I have only recently noticed some of your latest edits. I am also resident in South Africa and I think we share similar ideas on Wikipedia. I am currently building a bridge on the Xuka River, so you should find that interesting. Here the little Xhosa girls still collect firewood and the boys bring in the mielie harvest by donkey. Gregorydavid 05:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Geobox river and landmark
Hi, I've given your suggestion some more thought and I added extra field(s) named landmark. It gets displayed under the City/Cities, the default label being Landmark(s). It can be indexed, currently up to 15 landmarks can be listed. Hope you find this satisfactory. If you have any further questions/suggestions, feel free to write. – Caroig (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Misleading edit summary
Your most recent edit summary on Spoiler is rather misleading - it suggests that the edit Tony reverted just added the date. It did not. Please be careful not to make misleading edit summaries, as they are often considered disruptive. Phil Sandifer 00:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I reviewed the edit in question (this one, right?), and I don't see it as "misleading." I see it as critizing Phil's action, and perhaps not assuming good faith on Phil's part. Phil's warning to you is probably a reaction to your comment "Phil's weasel-ish 'in the past'...." Suggest you try to keep comments about other editors out of your Edit Summary text. ;)  David Spalding (  ☎ ✉ ✍  ) 13:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

River
1. I am trying. At present I started with the rivers in Romania, where I worked for some time, to see how a system can be developed to be generalized for other countries.

2. I am willing to help, just let me know what you intend to do.

3. The main problem with rivers is that the general information is relatively poor. It is therefore important to have decent mapt which present the rivers. Most contemporary maps concentrate on roads and administrative divisions and neglect rivers. The maps should be as detailed as possible showing also small tributaries not only the big rivers.

4. It would be useful to find out if there are any government agencies in charge of waters and if they have an inventory of the rivers. This could be a good start to find out what is available.

5. I consider a sytematic approach is required. Just finding a river and writing an article about it does not fill the gap.

6. Let's keep in touch to decide how we go on further.

Regards.Afil 02:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Again about rivers
Sorry for the delay. I went through the files zou suggested, but the various files just contain some data about different cross-sections. I was not able to finalize anything and it is for not having tried. Maybe there is a way to consolidate the various files in a single table, and find a way to link it to the maps. The maps show the network but not the names of the rivers. That is not very useful. I would like to make some progress and am therefore waiting for suggestions.Afil

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Hemlock
You recently changed the hemlock to redirect directly to the conium page. I don't know about the UK but in the states when we say just hemlock it's usually referring to the tree, not poison hemlock. If you want proof of this, type hemlock into google image search. Unless you dispute this I'm going to change it back to the way it was. --Calibas 02:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2008 in Cape Town
Hi. Would you be interested in helping to ensure Wikimania 2008 is held in Cape Town? If so, please go to the Cape Town bid page, and sign up on the discussion page. Feel free to dive right in with adding suggestions, or fleshing out the bid! I'd greatly appreciate any help, no matter how small. Greenman 00:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Capitalization
This is something that ought to have a wider audience so I have copied your text from the Talk:Battle of Waterloo to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. --Philip Baird Shearer 06:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I had not seen your earlier paragraph or I would have directed the conversation there. People like to solve real problems not hypothetical ones, so being able to show then two contrary suggestions on the same talk page of such a famous battle helps to concentrate minds. --Philip Baird Shearer 11:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks Kierano for the courteous welcome (as opposed to others) — much appreciated! Bmpdragon 10:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Geobox 2
Hello, this message is sent to you because you've shown some interest in the Geobox templates in past. There is now a new version (aka Geobox 2) which supersedes all older Geoboxes (aka Geobox 1). The major difference is there are no feature specific templates (Settlement, River, Mountain range etc.) but just one master template which can handle all type of data. There are a couple of new features and many new fields making the template much more versatile so now it can be used for virtually any geography related feature without the need to create a specific template.

The switch to Geoboxes 2.0 is highly recommended as the new template has a much more effective code, which renders faster than the old one (with much smaller pre-expand size, it can be one third to one fourth of the pre-expand size of Geoboxes 1). To convert aa page from Geobox 1 to Geobox 2, there are two ways:
 * By changing the template header: {{Geobox Settlement  becomes  {{Geobox|Settlement  Although some field names have been changed in order to be unified, the old names are accepted too. For any settlement Geobox use  {{Geobox|Settlement  and set the settlement type (city, borough, town, village) in category field. Calling e.g.  {{Geobox|City  will work as well but it's not the recommended way (from technical reasons).
 * By a semi-automated tool which reorders the field names in the Geobox 2 style and also renames the few changed field names.

There are several unresolved issues at the Geobox talk page, please add your comments and of course any other ideas you might come with as well as bug reports. – Caroig (talk) 09:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Andrieux: Waterloo
Hi Kierano, I've updated the information on Commons. For a detailed description of the image please have a look at Contexte historique, Analyse de l’image, Interprétation by L’Histoire par l’image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC) P.S. By the way: a good source for pictures is Joconde, a catalogue of the collection of french museums (where you'll also find Andrieux's painting)

The (n00b) Editor
I grew weary of proof reading Project Gutenberg texts so I decided to become a wiki editor. It's a little intimidating, so I started with the Paddington Bear discussion page. My username is self explanatory though uninspired. Miss Cicatrix 12:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

re: Battle of Waterloo FAC
Thanks for your message. I'd love to copy-edit this and will try to make the time for it. I reckon it will take about 10-15 hours so it will have to be done piecemeal, spread over a couple of weeks. I have some of the sources but would prefer to concentrate on style as delving for references is very time-consuming. Easiest and best is to do it section by section with people who know the sources checking that nothing significant has been up on the cutting room floor. The lead should be done last, just before nomination so that it reflects the final shape of the article. Does this suit you? -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 22:20, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Waterloo
Hullo Kierano, thanks for the link. If the copyright has expired, and the images are in the public domain, we can probably find reproductions in other places. I'll have a look at the talk now. Ceoil (talk) 21:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I followed the last FAC from a distance, and I'll keep an eye from here on in; though I'm not MilHist I can help with some of the more cosmetic aspects. Ceoil (talk) 22:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for editing that opening paragraph on Doctor Steel, making it more objective. I went by afterward and removed the last sentence of that paragraph, which I didn't really like since I first saw it. (And as you noted, there were no citations for it.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.245.7 (talk) 09:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)  This was me, but I'm sure you figured that out already... --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * (e.g. The Army of Toy Soldiers is the street team, but the plans for creating a "Utopian Playground" are clearly part of the fiction). For an encyclopaedia, it's important to make the distinction. True (although there are quite a few of the Army with whom that distinction is blurred, lol). Which is why I put "Utopian Playground" in quotation marks in the article, where once it was not. It's part of his fictional agenda and part of what the Army puts out there on the street, so it's relevant... so not really sure how else to put it other than setting it off with quotes, but any other ideas are welcome. :) --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads-up about the images. I've got absolutely no clue how copyright works, therefore I've forwarded your concerns to Doctor Steel; I'm sure he has lawyers that know all about that sort of thing and can provide the necessary... whatever. :) I'll let you know as soon as I hear back from him (probably a day or so). --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I just got an email back from Dr. Steel. He wrote:


 * Dear Jonny,
 * Dear Jonny,


 * Though I am unable to invest the legal time and funds to move this particular cause forward at this time, I look forward to being able to do so in the future.


 * In the meantime, should they require an e-mail from me or a written letter I will be happy to do so.


 * Sincerely,
 * ~Dr. Phineas Waldolf Steel


 * Not sure if this helps any...???


 * I noted that I had put "used by permission of Dr. Steel" and his email address on the pictures I used... --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, all this legalese really confuses me. I just got an email from Sgt. Kato (who started and runs the fan website, and one of Dr. Steel's personal friends) and said we were free to use any of the images on this page. So all we need to do is post it on this site and select that CC-BY-SA as the licensing? Am I right?


 * I did find a good pic from a fan that I could use showing the Toy Soldiers in uniform, that could be added to the page right above the propaganda poster... --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 23:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Received the following from the Doctor today:

Dear Jonny, Please feel free to display any images presented via www.toysoldiersunite.com, www.doctorsteel.com, www.myspace.com/drsteel or http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=651306630 for use on the Wikepedia page about me. Thank you for your wonderful support, ~Dr. Phineas Waldolf Steel

That should suffice? --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Your note
I've responded on my talk page. Thanks. Acalamari 15:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Eureka Diamond
Hello! Your submission of Eureka Diamond at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 12:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject South Africa
I have recently overhauled WikiProject South Africa with the following:
 * Improving collaboration of participants by adding an Open tasks section with specific as well as common tasks
 * Added link to the CatScan tool to find articles needing cleanup, referencing and expanding
 * Added common tasks that should be performed on Portal:South Africa
 * Added information on how to add Geographical coordinates
 * Added articles missing Images
 * Added assessment information
 * Improving the layout to make access to information easier
 * Added simple "How can I help?" instructions for new project members
 * Extended the Resources section to assist participants in finding South Africa related information
 * Added bot generated Article alerts
 * Added a bot generated Cleanup listing
 * Added more information on template usage
 * Added a section on language usage
 * Improved the categories section with trees for category:South Africa Wikipedia administration and category:South Africa
 * Added link to Wikipedia Books
 * Marked inactive sections of the project as inactive

Comments, constructive criticism and suggestions for improving it further are welcome --NJR_ZA (talk) 07:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Stellenbosch to bid for Wikimania 2012!
Hi Kierano!

The nascent South African Wikimedia chapter has decided to bid to host Wikimania in Stellenbosch, South Africa in 2012. This would be the first Wikimania in South Africa, and would be a great advertisement for our country. Please take a look at meta:Wikimania_2012/Bids/Stellenbosch. If you can add to the discussion, please do. If you feel that you are able to do anything to help, please join the Wikimedia South Africa mailing list and let us know. Even simple messages of support are valued!

Best regards,

David Richfield

LoDaisKa Site
Author's name is now fixed; it's a simple copy/paste error. Thanks for letting me know! Nyttend (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Donald Van Slyke
The DYK project (nominate) 06:16, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

RE: DYK nomination of Battle of Kororareka
I have revised the Battle of Kororareka article, and I believe addressed all the problems listed at the DYK nomination. Please let me know if I have missed anything. OCNative (talk) 01:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! OCNative (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Yusuf Dadoo
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

UKZN edits
Hi, I've just started to flesh out the University of KwaZulu-Natal page and add some references, though it's the first time I've edited a page and I'm not sure if all the citations and writing style are ok. I'm doing this because many international/exchange students going to UKZN complain about the lack of online information for the university and I have to agree. By the way, nice to see someone else from Pietermaritzburg interested in Bioinformatics. I plan to specialise in it soon at the University of Edinburgh ;) MartinMorrison (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I will add some innocent stuff now like departments, student life, sporting etc ;-) I'll try recruit some more nerds over at the geology and comp sci departments to come in and edit in more information on their departments and lecturers. Will also add information on student exchanges and stuff. I'll try dig up some information on 2006 strike. MartinMorrison (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Cool, I'll do that now, I'm just not sure how to make a completely new page? I need to do that for the departments also. MartinMorrison (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright thanks, I will change my style but I keep getting timeouts with every edit/preview so going to take a break now ... thanks alot for the help! MartinMorrison (talk) 21:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, I'll be more careful from now on. Doesn't seem like UKZN are interested in getting their wikipedia page up to scratch anyway. I'm just going to contribute to the controversies page because I think it's the kind of information you're not going to find on the UKZN website.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinMorrison (talk • contribs) 23:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Nanny state, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

NAS / Institute of Medicine
hello Kierno,

United States National Academy of Sciences’ is made up of three major components 1. The institute of medicine 2. The National Acadamy of Science 3. The Engineering academy The three are called the National Academy of Sciences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorukzn (talk • contribs) 13:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Malegapuru William Makgoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethesda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Inviting you to WikiAfrica Incubator!
Hey Kierano,

WikiAfrica invites you to support the Africa Incubator.

WikiAfrica is pleased to invite you as a self-declared African Wikipedian to evaluate the Africa Incubator. WikiAfrica has created the Africa Incubator to support and assist new authors, as they create their first articles and learn the ins and outs of contributing to Wikipedia.

The Africa Incubator is a ‘soft landing’ for new authors to develop articles that relate to Africa. It assists them in becoming compliant and knowledgeable of Wikipedia principles and rules. Based within the Wikipedia framework, the Africa Incubator is fully interactive and enables feedback, assistance and forums.

This is where we need your help! For the Africa Incubator to be successful, it needs the intervention, interaction and experience of Incubator Mentors. We are looking for a pool of active experienced Wikipedians to consistently participate in ’owning’ the Africa Incubator. Incubator Mentors will assist new comers through the editing process. They will also help test and expand the Africa Incubator, and will play a vital role in encouraging newcomers to be Wikipedians for life

Please visit WikiAfrica Incubator to give us your honest feedback and evaluation. WikiAfrica is a ground-breaking project that is designed to Africanise Wikipedia by generating and expanding 30,000 articles over two years. Find out more about this project here WikiAfrica. To get involved, contact Francis [wikipedian@wikiafrica.net] Twitter: twitter.com/#!/wikiafrica Facebook: www.facebook.com/WikiAfrica --Awinda 13:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awinda (talk • contribs)

Wiki Loves Monuments in South Africa
Dear WikiProject South Africa Wikipedians

This is an urgent call from Wikimedia South Africa. We are currently working hard on the South African side of the exciting international photographic competition, Wiki Loves Monuments. We have been planning to make this national competition really take off, but to do so, we need your help! The competition starts on the 1st September, and we need your help now! If you are interested in being part of or can help the Wiki Loves Monuments national organising team, then please join here [ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012_in_South_Africa]. If you have limited time, but want to help out at an upload marathon at a heritage site near you, please then contact either Lourie [louriepieterse@yahoo.com] or Isla [islahf@africacentre.net]. We look forward to hearing from you!"

Kind regards, Lourie

Sent by Lucia Bot in 14:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa
Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabell@undefineddoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahf@undefinedafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:24, 16 November 2012 (UTC))

Hydronymy
Hallo, I am interested in hydronymy as it looks the language of prehistoric Europe is reflected therein. I left a message on the wikiproject rivers talkpage, just looking for editors with similar interests to exchange information. I have discovered the so called old european hydronymy is not limited to Europe but has many correspondences in Iran, India and furhter away so I think this disproves the current scholarly etymological interpretations. Presently I am trying to research Bengal and Burma. Thanks for reading.Aldrasto11 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578281160 your edit] to Robert LeFevre may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Robert |title=A Way to Be Free, Volume One |publisher=Pulpless |location=Culver City, CA |year=1999   posthumously|isbn=1-58445-141-6 }} was an American [[libertarianism|
 * A Way to Be Free, Volume Two (back cover)|publisher=Pulpless |location=Culver City, CA |year=1999) posthumously|isbn=1-58445-144-0 }}

Flow cytometry bioinformatics
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Flow cytometry bioinformatics, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://topicpages.ploscompbiol.org/wiki/Flow_cytometry_bioinformatics.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Flow cytometry bioinformatics
Hello! Your submission of Flow cytometry bioinformatics at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! I am One of Many (talk) 08:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Stora Blåsjön at prep 4
Hi Kierano. In your edit at Prep 4 you didn't add a dyk make credit: as shown here. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  05:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Bronze Heads from Ife
Thanks for ticking Alt1, I thought we were going to discuss it forver!! - can we remove the "in 1938" as it seems that this happened earlier? Merry xmas Victuallers (talk) 11:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Emil Rebreanu
Hi Kierano, just a note re the DYK nomination for Emil Rebeanu in case you don't have it on your watchlist and pings don't work on the template page! The reviewer had left a note about the refs and I've just tried loading them as well. I didn't want to just re-instate the AGF tick in case we're not addressing your query, so could you pop back and have another look at it when you get the chance, please? Thanks! I've just been trying to get some additional nominations through the process as it seems a bit log jammed at the moment ... SagaciousPhil  -  Chat  15:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Mat ty. 007 19:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Jake Diekman
May I ask why you promoted it to prep area one, which already had a hook that included a picture, rather than one where the picture of Diekman could run? Thanks.  Go  Phightins  !  23:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Robert Drayson
I read at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Drayson that you promoted this nomination on the 19th, and Talk:Robert Drayson says it appeared on the main page the same day, but I haven't yet had a DYK notice about it. Could you please fix that?

I can't think why you changed the Alt hook which no one had approved. My suggestion was that the school did not need to be mentioned. The US has "high schools", and for all I know South Africa may, too, but it's a rare term in the British Isles and isn't used of Stowe. Moonraker (talk) 14:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  16:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Flow cytometry bioinformatics
 Harrias  talk 00:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Emil Rebreanu
Hi, I just came across the history of this DYK nomination. I didn't say there were "broken URLs", but that there were "bald URLs" (or "bare URLs"), which violates Rule D3. Yoninah (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Flow cytometry bioinformatics
Hi Kierano,

I don't know if you have seen the comments I left at Talk:Flow cytometry bioinformatics.

Are you able to help with answers to some of the questions. I think clarifying the situation around points 1 and 2 would be especially helpful.

Yaris678 (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Fidel Kuri Grajales DYK
I left a message on the nomination and pinged you. I'm having a bit of an issue because the DYK Check script I use is telling me I've expanded the article 5x based on readable prose but you say I still need to add about 1,800 characters. Has there been a recent change at DYK or was that calculation made in error? Raymie (t • c) 19:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

ISMB Editathon
Hi Kierano,

Thanks for signing up for the Wikipedia editathon. Given your expertise would you be on hand to help out with any newbies?

Thanks Alexbateman (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Contests
User:Dr. Blofeld has created WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Wolfshiem
I saw from 19:30, 29 January 2017 you made to The Great Gatsby article. You did not correct the spelling of "Wolfshiem". There was a prominent note attached to the name that explains why it was correct. I am not sure how it could have been missed. I have reverted the text back. Please be more careful in the future. Jason Quinn (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sea buckthorn oil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

DYK for Christoph Bock
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

"Used a buddy"
Please would you strike that? Alexbrn (talk) 20:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You didn't. Consider your card marked. Alexbrn (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Single cell epigenomics
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)