User talk:Kieron03

December 2018
Hello, I'm OhKayeSierra. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, A Chaos of Flowers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

About your images
Hi, Kieron! Thanks for your edits so far. I wanted to let you know that I reverted your addition of images to several articles, like Ciarán and Cosmos bipinnatus; I appreciate your intent, but the images didn't really add to the articles. Per the Manual of Style, Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative ... not every article needs images, and too many can be distracting. There's no real need to incorporate an image of the alternate spelling "Kieron" to the Ciarán; it's not conveying any information that isn't already in the text of the article, since it's simply a word. Its use is solely decorative, so there's no real purpose for it in the article.

Your images on Cosmos bipinnatus and Pyramid of Khafre were reverted for similar reasons; while it makes sense to have images on those articles, both are already well-supplied with images, and yours didn't add any new information. Moreover, as you noted in the captions, they were digitally altered; there's nothing wrong with digitally altering images in general, but changing the colors of a photograph of the article's subject reduces the informational value of that photo, since it no longer looks like the subject. To quote the Manual of Style again, Images should look like what they are meant to illustrate ... a photograph of a trompe-l'œil painting of a cupcake may be an acceptable image for Cupcake, but a real cupcake that has been decorated to look like something else entirely is less appropriate.

Again, thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia. My reversion of your edits doesn't mean that the images were particularly bad, or that your efforts in modifying and uploading them aren't appreciated; it's just that they didn't add much encyclopedic information to the articles, which is the main point for article images in the first place. Sorry for what might be a bumpy introduction to Wikipedia, but good luck and happy editing! Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 21:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joelinton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)