User talk:Kierzek/Archive/2017/July

SD and Eichmann
Kierzek -- thanks for correcting my SD diamonds faux pas. Not sure what I was thinking but your correction immediately rang the bell (duh). Uniforms are not my area - obviously. Danke viel mals.--Obenritter (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries; your brain was, for that moment, probably thinking of the SD sleeve diamond. What is important is the fact that you have beefed up that article and many others to the benefit of general readers. Fortfahren, Kierzek (talk) 22:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Roger that Sir. Just a few more weeks and my research begins again. This time I'll try to pop in a little more frequently to Wiki-land.--Obenritter (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Military-related article at WP:RSN
Hey, Kierzek! Not sure if you have any interest in this, but I thought I would run it by you. Per the discussion here, do you think could replace  as sourcing for the opening sentence in Battery Harris? It's well beyond my area of expertise to interpret that article. Cheers! -Location (talk) 18:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * There's actually no problem citing fortwiki; the proscription is against usingwikipeida itsel as a source, not anything with "wiki" in the name. Anmccaff (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The Coastal Defense Journal appears to be a RS source; where the "fortwiki" is still a wiki where the editorial oversight is not clearly known and I see right away it uses Wikipedia as a source, so no, I would not say it is RS. Kierzek (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Agree with about the inappropriateness of the wiki source. Sagecandor (talk) 03:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The [www.cdsg.org CDSG], a nickle-plated, copper-bottomed, gold standard, and several other overused metal analogy source, rather strongly recommends fortwiki, putting it in with some distinguished company:
 * Featured Links, International Fortress Council, www.internationalfortresscouncil.org, Fortress Study Group, fsgfort.com, Council on America’s Military Past, www.campjamp.org, FortWiki, www.fortwiki.com, North American Forts – American Forts Network, www.northamericanforts.com, National Archives, www.archives.gov
 * Don't let the "wiki" in the name fool you. Anmccaff (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I would ask that further comments on this matter be made on the Reliable sources/Noticeboard, instead of here. I stand by my comments above. Kierzek (talk) 15:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you mind my moving them there, to keep the conversation in one place? Anmccaff (talk) 15:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't mind. Kierzek (talk) 15:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

 * You are welcome. Kierzek (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)