User talk:Kihtrakv

May 2013
Hello, I'm Ducknish. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Ducknish (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi

What i wrote was a mere restatement of law and facts as they stand, with hyperlinks to official documents originating from the Union Ministry for Women and Child Welfare (as evidence). Any enactment of law has to be free of bias, which is unfortunately uncharacteristic of the Sexual Harassment Bill, that is available only for women, in India, which is an unusual practice.

May I humbly submit that pointing to a bias in law, as a statement of fact, is by itself not biased/ non-neutral. Neutrality applies to a description of inferences and judgements, borne out of reason. However, stating a fact as it is, (e.g.: humidity is 91% or that this bill for sexual harassment is available only for women) - is not within the ambit of neutrality!

If a further edit is required to align with the revised extant text, would appreciate if you could please revert at the earliest by email to venugopal.karthik@gmail.com

Regards, Karthik