User talk:Kiliopa

Your edit on the article Treason has been reverted due to bias
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Treason (specifically, the caption you added to the photo of Litvinenko). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Richard75 (talk) 11:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Treason, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Treason has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Prmcd16 (talk) 12:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Henry VIII of England. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Henry VIII of England was changed by Kiliopa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877616 on 2016-04-26T00:37:31+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Sro23 (talk) 00:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)