User talk:Kill censorship

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Josephus on Jesus, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=490622764 here]. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 12:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:V AND WP:RS. You cannot argue against the professional experts on the basis of your personal views. The fact that the Annals are not quoted in surviving sources does not mean that they were "unknown". Many surving ancient texts are not quoted by other authors. Paul B (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

destroy biased religious editing
destroy biased religious editing Kill censorship (talk) 12:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Syrthiss (talk) 12:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.