User talk:Killa Koz

Dragonball Evolution Budget
The removal of the budget on the Dragonball Evolution page should not be construed as vandalism. It should not be listed because no official figure has ever been presented by the production studio. The figure 	$45 million given on the page comes from a source not related to the production team responsible for the movie. It is unclear as to how reliable the information is. To prevent confusion or debate on the matter, it should not be stated as an official figure. If the information must be on the page in some form, it should be listed alongside the other unconfirmed budget reports. --69.86.244.115 (talk) 01:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Please remain civil.
Your comment at Talk:Dragonball Evolution was not particularly helpful. While the other editor may have been uncivil, that does not justify you to be uncivil in return by calling their statements "crap". All editors are required to remain civil with one another. --Farix (Talk) 19:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:RPP report
Your report lists the request as full protection, but then you say that there is a lot of IP vandalism. So all that should be needed if there is a lot of IP vandalism is semiprotection. Just looking for clarification. Thanks, -- Terrillja talk  18:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:StephF.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:StephF.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:EmmyBulma.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:EmmyBulma.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Online Wiki
I only removed an advertisement from the Wiki, as DBMMO is a community, not a news site. They have no source sitings, and no credit given to original sources. Copy pasting information from other sites does not make them a credible news/information link. I ask you to review my request without a bias. Look at their site, ask yourself if they count as a news source or as a community, ask yourself if they have preformed palgorism. Respond back after you have fully taken in all ifnormation neccessary to make a clear, and informed decission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.178.132.82 (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Again you don't know what your talking about. Yes its true they offered beta accounts but that was the old owner. he sold the site and they stopped doing that and turned into an information site for English readers and speakers. Saying the copied blah blah is stupid, what do you think other sites and wikipedia do? yeah be quiet.68.218.191.107 (talk) 20:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Falcon8765 (talk) 11:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DBGTAHL.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DBGTAHL.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 11:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

This IP
Please ban it from Wikipedia. My reason is because people use a little program called Softether VPN, to connect to Softether's Japan-based connection to bypass country-bans on Japanese-only MMO's. I'm currently living in Ontario, Canada, and I'm on a Japanese IP connection.

Basically, if you want to prevent this IP from doing any more damage to the wiki, block it now and for good. 203.178.132.82 (talk) 22:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Duke Nukem Forever
Could you please explain this revert, and preferably participate in the discussion about this at Talk:Duke Nukem Forever? --Conti|✉ 18:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:12Rposter.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:12Rposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

April 2022
Hello, I'm Ferret. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Diablo Immortal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 12:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)