User talk:Killemall723

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kitti's Hog-nosed Bat, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kitti's Hog-nosed Bat was changed by Killemall723 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896961 on 2011-10-17T14:33:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kitti's Hog-nosed Bat with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 14:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kitti's Hog-nosed Bat with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 14:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kitti's Hog-nosed Bat. DVdm (talk) 14:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)