User talk:Killerwolff22

BRD
Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.   Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 8 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. - TNT ✨ 22:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Die Hard for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You went straight back to the same article to restore same disputed edit when your block expired. That's not acceptable.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)