User talk:Killing Vector/Archives/2007/May

Heineken
Please post the reason for your merge proposal of Heineken and Heineken International on the appropriate talk pages. I agree the articles need some work, but I see no need for merging. Also see Talk:Heineken International/Archives/2014. – Ilse@ 20:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar


Best regards Mads Angelbo Talk / Contribs 14:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You just made my day :-D --Stlemur 15:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Muffin Top
You gave the justification "unencyclopedic, unsourceable, unsalvageable" to delete the muffin top article outright, but I strongly disagree with all three. The article is encyclopedic according to Wikipedia standards. Although the article was unsourced, I was able to quickly find and add a source, meaning that it's not unsourceable. Since I fixed it, it is not unsalvageable either. I think it's more likely that you PERSONALLY object to the term "muffin top" and find it offensive, but just because you may have made that determination does not mean it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. "Fuck" is offensive too but certainly deserves its space.

I suggest that you: Forteblast 07:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Be more cautious with the deletion templates. Post something on the associated talk page before immediately requesting deletion.
 * Take articles whose subjects you find offensive less personally.


 * Please assume good faith on my part. I have no particular objection to the term as a term; but firstly it is patently unencyclopdic, not only since Wikipedia is not a dictionary but also because even if it were, the term is a slang term; the sources cited are not reliable nor scholarly. Hence I have listed the article for deletion. --Stlemur 07:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Proof? How is it unencyclopedic? If this article belongs in a dictionary rather than Wikipedia, explain why whale tail, tramp stamp and love handles deserve articles but muffin top does not. The problem described by the term is apparently important enough to spawn a different style of jeans and plenty of discussion on the internet, if not 'scholarly articles'. When a university funds a study on muffin tops, I'll be glad to add it as a reference too. Forteblast 08:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Killian's
Hi Stlemur! You undid my merge to the company. No problem. Looking at your notes you undid it before I had completed the edit to the parent company, and so must have wondered where the content was. I am following the Wiki guidelines Notability (organizations and companies). Your edit was understandable in that you were not aware of what I was doing. As we know each other I have no problem with you in future having a quick word with me to check on something like this. Regards SilkTork 15:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

About Flying the Flag (for You)
Hi. Your edit to this page was reverted, because it wasn't classed as a tie - France got more votes than the UK, and the ESC official website doesn't split 22nd between France and the UK. Thanks! Will (is it can be time for messages now plz?) 13:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

photo credit
Hi, i'm using one of your photos in my thesis, under which name should i credit it for you?

can contact me at descartavel1 at gmail if you prefer.

thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gcbwikipedia (talk • contribs) 18:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC).

Hello again, i tried to reply on the same day, but got a database maintenance... i'm using one pic from a brewery, from the fermentation article. Also, you don't happen to have a flickr account or something with tons of brewery pics, do you? :)

Gcbwikipedia 03:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi again! do you happen to have pics of the keg filling process? Thanks! and thanks again for all your beer articles contributions Gcbwikipedia 13:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Continuation War
Please, don't remove anything, without providing clear and valid reasoning !

Thanks. Acting otherwise would be vandalism.

The proper Wikipedia links seem to have been provided in the past - and they can be reinstalled.

It truly is important to see what the highest political and military leaders of both parties - from the war time period and now - say about these events, especially when their opinions clearly coincide about the most important questions: Who started, and why - and who lost, and why, etc.

The "Contentious history views" segment appears to have been agreed upon by all, right prior to last Christmas Eve. The sources appear provided to all contested wordings. See related history file.

More sources are widely available, and more of course can be added - and will be, as our childes FSB puppet grows up. Isn't there a small organized camping in the heart of Moscow - in front of the Estonian Embassy - for those FSP youth hired to protest against the growing awareness within the Russian society about the true recent Russian history, the one not tainted by Josef Stalin. Perhaps that would be a place for him to go ?

User Art Dominique is not prohibited from contributing here ! I've checked. You check for yourself too. Besides, I personally do not mind using only one ID name. I do not wish to be credited for the works of others, however.

Lieutenant Dan Taylor 21:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Stlemur! So, you're my new sockpuppet, eh? Nice to meetcha! :-) Would you recommend something from the Flatworld series for me? Cheers, Illythr 13:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Federal subjects of Russia
Hi there! I've just noticed that you tagged the "Mergers" section of this article as in need of updating. Could you, please, clarify, what exactly is missing? From what I see, the section is reasonably complete (I might have missed some recent developments, though). Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll try to update it when I have time. Just wanted to make sure nothing really-really important is missing.  Thanks much.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Dumbest category ever
--AW 14:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)